ASCCY vs. EAT
ASCCY (Asics Corp ADR) and EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — ASCCY in Footwear & Accessories, EAT in Restaurants. Over the past 5 years, ASCCY returned 35.93%/yr vs 18.17%/yr for EAT. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASCCY vs. EAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASCCY achieves a 15.61% return, which is significantly higher than EAT's 1.83% return.
ASCCY
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- -7.87%
- YTD
- 15.61%
- 6M
- 16.36%
- 1Y
- 14.66%
- 3Y*
- 57.94%
- 5Y*
- 35.93%
- 10Y*
- —
EAT
- 1D
- 4.04%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 2.69%
- 1Y
- -14.86%
- 3Y*
- 59.52%
- 5Y*
- 18.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
ASCCY vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCCY Asics Corp ADR | 15.61% | 21.77% | 152.83% | 43.48% | 1.37% | 10.10% | 18.67% | 27.61% | -13.67% | -0.86% |
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 1.83% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -35.32% | 36.16% | -0.92% | 17.27% | 26.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASCCY and EAT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2017 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
ASCCY:
$19.60B
EAT:
$6.50B
ASCCY:
$161.60
EAT:
$10.14
ASCCY:
0.17
EAT:
14.41
ASCCY:
0.00
EAT:
0.33
ASCCY:
0.02
EAT:
1.16
ASCCY:
0.06
EAT:
16.02
ASCCY:
$885.06B
EAT:
$5.73B
ASCCY:
$476.81B
EAT:
$3.45B
ASCCY:
$190.22B
EAT:
$807.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASCCY vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank
ASCCY
EAT
ASCCY vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASCCY | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.98 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | -0.34 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | -0.69 | +2.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASCCY | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | -0.32 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.37 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.28 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
ASCCY vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASCCY drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, smaller than the maximum EAT drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCCY and EAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASCCY | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.92% | -88.40% | +23.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.82% | -44.41% | +23.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.09% | -45.92% | +18.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.44% | -65.54% | +18.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -84.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.52% | -22.73% | +9.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.14% | -24.34% | +6.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.05% | 21.68% | -10.63% |
Volatility
ASCCY vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY) is 10.94%, while Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a volatility of 16.59%. This indicates that ASCCY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASCCY | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.94% | 16.59% | -5.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.92% | 35.50% | -6.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.97% | 46.55% | -5.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.87% | 48.95% | -4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.10% | 55.09% | -7.99% |
Dividends
ASCCY vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison
ASCCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCCY Asics Corp ADR | 0.29% | 0.34% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
Financials
ASCCY vs. EAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Asics Corp ADR and Brinker International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ASCCY vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison
ASCCY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported a gross profit of 142.55B and revenue of 275.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
ASCCY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported an operating income of 61.88B and revenue of 275.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
ASCCY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported a net income of 47.43B and revenue of 275.23B, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASCCY and EAT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EAT has higher volatility (16.59%) compared to ASCCY (10.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASCCY dropped -64.92% vs EAT's -88.40%.
ASCCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASCCY and EAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer