ASBFY vs. GIS
ASBFY (Associated British Foods plc) and GIS (General Mills, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, ASBFY returned -3.11%/yr vs -3.11%/yr for GIS. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASBFY vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASBFY achieves a -11.49% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -28.66% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: ASBFY at -3.11% and GIS at -3.11%.
ASBFY
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- -11.49%
- 6M
- -8.63%
- 1Y
- -7.62%
- 3Y*
- 5.81%
- 5Y*
- -2.19%
- 10Y*
- -3.11%
GIS
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- -28.66%
- 6M
- -28.20%
- 1Y
- -37.41%
- 3Y*
- -24.38%
- 5Y*
- -9.55%
- 10Y*
- -3.11%
ASBFY vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASBFY Associated British Foods plc | -11.49% | 15.77% | -12.28% | 62.38% | -28.46% | -9.69% | -9.93% | 35.77% | -31.15% | 16.06% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -28.66% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASBFY and GIS is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2007 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
ASBFY:
$17.83B
GIS:
$17.45B
ASBFY:
$3.18
GIS:
$4.08
ASBFY:
7.89
GIS:
7.88
ASBFY:
0.28
GIS:
3.39
ASBFY:
0.45
GIS:
0.95
ASBFY:
1.55
GIS:
1.87
ASBFY:
$39.23B
GIS:
$18.37B
ASBFY:
$6.25B
GIS:
$4.70B
ASBFY:
$5.17B
GIS:
$3.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASBFY vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
ASBFY
GIS
ASBFY vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Associated British Foods plc (ASBFY) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASBFY | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.73 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | -0.99 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | -2.06 | +1.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASBFY | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | -1.59 | +1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | -0.45 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | -0.14 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.42 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
ASBFY vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASBFY drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASBFY and GIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASBFY | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.71% | -59.63% | -12.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.12% | -37.97% | +12.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.73% | -57.09% | +25.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.56% | -59.63% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.35% | -59.63% | -7.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.11% | -59.63% | +18.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.17% | -10.25% | -16.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.67% | 18.20% | -4.53% |
Volatility
ASBFY vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Associated British Foods plc (ASBFY) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS) have volatilities of 6.56% and 6.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASBFY | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 6.78% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.71% | 18.45% | +2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.54% | 23.60% | +3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.48% | 21.09% | +8.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.22% | 22.08% | +10.14% |
Dividends
ASBFY vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
ASBFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than GIS's 7.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASBFY Associated British Foods plc | 3.31% | 2.89% | 4.55% | 2.43% | 2.71% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.51% | 1.52% | 1.09% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 7.58% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
Financials
ASBFY vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Associated British Foods plc and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ASBFY vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison
ASBFY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Associated British Foods plc reported a gross profit of 636.98M and revenue of 9.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.7%.
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ASBFY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Associated British Foods plc reported an operating income of 636.98M and revenue of 9.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 524.60M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
ASBFY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Associated British Foods plc reported a net income of 444.29M and revenue of 9.45B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 303.10M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASBFY and GIS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to ASBFY (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASBFY dropped -71.71% vs GIS's -59.63%.
ASBFY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASBFY and GIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer