ARWG vs. CCOR
ARWG (Archer Growth ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. ARWG charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.
Performance
ARWG vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARWG achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -2.83% return.
ARWG
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 5.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCOR
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- -2.83%
- 6M
- -3.45%
- 1Y
- -4.45%
- 3Y*
- -1.73%
- 5Y*
- -2.06%
- 10Y*
- —
ARWG vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARWG Archer Growth ETF | 5.39% | -0.95% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | -2.83% | -0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARWG and CCOR is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARWG vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank
ARWG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CCOR
ARWG vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer Growth ETF (ARWG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARWG | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.91 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARWG vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARWG drawdown since its inception was -12.79%, smaller than the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARWG and CCOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARWG | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.79% | -22.99% | +10.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -19.29% | +16.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.34% | -7.36% | +4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.13% | — |
Volatility
ARWG vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARWG | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.95% | 7.56% | +15.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.95% | 11.15% | +11.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.95% | 10.76% | +12.19% |
ARWG vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARWG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARWG vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison
ARWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than CCOR's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARWG Archer Growth ETF | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.02% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARWG and CCOR have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARWG is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARWG is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.
CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.13% for ARWG.
They also come from different issuers: Archer Funds and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ARWG and 1.09% for CCOR.
Find the right allocation for ARWG and CCOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer