PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARVR vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARVR vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARVR achieves a 18.88% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return.


ARVR

1D
-0.64%
1M
11.38%
YTD
18.88%
6M
17.88%
1Y
35.02%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
10Y*

CIBR

1D
-2.81%
1M
31.43%
YTD
28.52%
6M
24.03%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
28.32%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
18.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARVR vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ARVR
First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF
18.88%29.07%10.11%43.39%-17.28%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
28.52%13.06%18.21%39.71%-25.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ARVR and CIBR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2022

0.71

The correlation between ARVR and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ARVR vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARVR
CIBR

Technology

43.8%
94.0%

Communication Services

10.4%
2.6%

Healthcare

2.1%

-

Industrials

1.1%
3.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

ARVR
43.8%
CIBR
94.0%

Communication Services

ARVR
10.4%
CIBR
2.6%

Healthcare

ARVR
2.1%
CIBR

-

Industrials

ARVR
1.1%
CIBR
3.5%

Basic Materials

ARVR

-

CIBR

-

Consumer Cyclical

ARVR

-

CIBR

-

Consumer Defensive

ARVR

-

CIBR

-

Energy

ARVR

-

CIBR

-

Financial Services

ARVR

-

CIBR

-

Real Estate

ARVR

-

CIBR

-

Utilities

ARVR

-

CIBR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARVR vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARVR
ARVR Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ARVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARVR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ARVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARVR Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARVR vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARVRCIBRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.82

1.06

+0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

1.56

+0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.20

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.18

+0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.02

2.79

+3.23

ARVR vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARVR and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARVRCIBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

1.06

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.67

+0.12

Drawdowns

ARVR vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARVR drawdown since its inception was -26.25%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARVR and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARVRCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.25%

-33.89%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.73%

-21.99%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.46%

-21.99%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-2.81%

+2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-8.66%

+2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.83%

9.25%

-3.42%

Volatility

ARVR vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) is 5.84%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that ARVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARVRCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

10.90%

-5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.85%

20.90%

-6.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.31%

24.50%

-5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.44%

24.95%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.44%

23.60%

-0.16%

ARVR vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARVR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARVR vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

ARVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, which matches CIBR's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARVR
First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF
0.45%0.53%0.81%0.11%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.45%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARVR and CIBR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to ARVR (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARVR dropped -26.25% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

On 3-year performance, CIBR leads with 28.32% vs 24.89% for ARVR. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, ARVR has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 28.32% return vs 24.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ARVR.

ARVR and CIBR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.45%.

ARVR tracks Indxx Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ARVR and 0.60% for CIBR.

ARVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARVR and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer