ARTY vs. GINN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ARTY (iShares Future AI & Tech ETF) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - ARTY tracks the Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index (Net) while GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ARTY returned 11.69%/yr vs 5.45%/yr for GINN. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ARTY charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.

Performance

ARTY vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARTY achieves a 54.55% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 5.00% return.

ARTY

• 1D: -6.30%
• 1M: 8.26%
• YTD: 54.55%
• 6M: 54.11%
• 1Y: 93.11%
• 3Y*: 33.04%
• 5Y*: 11.69%
• 10Y*: —

GINN

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: 5.00%
• 6M: 3.65%
• 1Y: 20.17%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: 5.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARTY vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ARTY iShares Future AI & Tech ETF	54.55%	29.97%	8.02%	36.37%	-37.89%	6.32%	10.73%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	5.00%	20.25%	18.71%	29.94%	-32.40%	10.39%	8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ARTY and GINN is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020	0.90

The correlation between ARTY and GINN shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ARTY vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARTY	GINN
Technology	89.8%	32.6%
Industrials	4.3%	4.7%
Communication Services	3.1%	10.7%
Utilities	1.3%	1.7%
Real Estate	1.0%	0.6%
Healthcare	0.5%	20.6%
Basic Materials	-	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.8%
Energy	-	1.7%
Financial Services	-	12.4%

Return for Risk

ARTY vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARTY

ARTY Risk / Return Rank: 81
ARTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ARTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
ARTY Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ARTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ARTY Martin Ratio Rank: 83

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 35
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARTY vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARTY	GINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.74	1.22	+1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	1.75	+1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.22	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.98	1.54	+3.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.28	5.39	+10.89

ARTY vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARTY and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARTY vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARTY drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, which is greater than GINN's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARTY and GINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARTY	GINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.50%	-41.25%	-13.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.81%	-13.18%	-5.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.44%	-22.25%	-10.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.53%	-41.25%	-9.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.78%	-4.93%	-2.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.76%	-13.28%	-6.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.74%	3.75%	+1.99%

Volatility

ARTY vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) has a higher volatility of 19.32% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 5.81%. This indicates that ARTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARTY	GINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.32%	5.81%	+13.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.00%	12.92%	+17.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.22%	16.57%	+17.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.57%	21.44%	+8.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.30%	21.07%	+7.23%

ARTY vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARTY has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARTY vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

ARTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than GINN's 1.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ARTY iShares Future AI & Tech ETF	0.06%	0.00%	0.50%	0.88%	0.75%	2.41%	0.53%	0.69%	0.34%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.20%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARTY and GINN in my portfolio?

ARTY and GINN have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARTY or GINN?

ARTY has higher volatility (19.32%) compared to GINN (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARTY dropped -54.50% vs GINN's -41.25%.

Which ETF is better, ARTY or GINN?

On 5-year performance, ARTY leads with 11.69% vs 5.45% for GINN. On fees, ARTY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARTY or GINN?

Over the 5-year period, ARTY has performed better with a 11.69% return vs 5.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARTY or GINN?

ARTY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARTY or GINN?

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.06% for ARTY.

What is the main difference between ARTY and GINN?

ARTY tracks Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index (Net), while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ARTY and 0.50% for GINN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.