ARTY vs. BAI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ARTY (iShares Future AI & Tech ETF) and BAI (iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from iShares. ARTY is passively managed, while BAI is actively managed. Over the past year, ARTY returned 112.42% vs 97.95% for BAI. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ARTY charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BAI.

Performance

ARTY vs. BAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) and iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARTY achieves a 66.09% return, which is significantly higher than BAI's 55.29% return.

ARTY

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 26.10%
• YTD: 66.09%
• 6M: 63.47%
• 1Y: 112.42%
• 3Y*: 36.54%
• 5Y*: 14.13%
• 10Y*: —

BAI

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 18.14%
• YTD: 55.29%
• 6M: 51.89%
• 1Y: 97.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARTY vs. BAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ARTY iShares Future AI & Tech ETF	66.09%	29.97%	4.85%
BAI iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF	55.29%	25.22%	8.06%

Correlation

The correlation between ARTY and BAI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2024	0.92

The correlation between ARTY and BAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARTY vs. BAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARTY	BAI
Technology	87.7%	83.2%
Industrials	5.3%	6.7%
Communication Services	3.5%	6.8%
Utilities	1.7%	-
Real Estate	1.2%	-
Healthcare	0.6%	0.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-

Return for Risk

ARTY vs. BAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARTY

ARTY Risk / Return Rank: 90
ARTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ARTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
ARTY Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ARTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ARTY Martin Ratio Rank: 90

BAI

BAI Risk / Return Rank: 82
BAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
BAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BAI Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
BAI Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARTY vs. BAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) and iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ARTY	BAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.78	3.04	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.13	3.41	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.46	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.01	6.07	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.88	16.57	+4.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ARTY vs. BAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARTY Sharpe Ratio is 3.78, which is comparable to the BAI Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARTY and BAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARTY	BAI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.78	3.04	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	1.69	-1.05

Drawdowns

ARTY vs. BAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARTY drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, which is greater than BAI's maximum drawdown of -34.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARTY and BAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARTY	BAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.50%	-34.09%	-20.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.81%	-16.22%	-2.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-0.40%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.85%	-6.93%	-12.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.40%	5.93%	-0.53%

Volatility

ARTY vs. BAI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) has a higher volatility of 12.01% compared to iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) at 11.32%. This indicates that ARTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARTY	BAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.01%	11.32%	+0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.12%	26.16%	-1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.94%	32.43%	-2.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.58%	35.06%	-6.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.75%	35.06%	-7.31%

ARTY vs. BAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARTY has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BAI's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARTY vs. BAI - Dividend Comparison

ARTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ARTY iShares Future AI & Tech ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.50%	0.88%	0.75%	2.41%	0.53%	0.69%	0.34%
BAI iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF	1.16%	1.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARTY and BAI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, ARTY and BAI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ARTY or BAI?

ARTY has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to BAI (11.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARTY dropped -54.50% vs BAI's -34.09%.

Which ETF is better, ARTY or BAI?

On 1-year performance, ARTY leads with 112.42% vs 97.95% for BAI. On fees, ARTY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, BAI has been the lower-risk option at 11.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARTY or BAI?

Over the 1-year period, ARTY has performed better with a 112.42% return vs 97.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARTY or BAI?

ARTY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARTY or BAI?

BAI has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.00% for ARTY.

What is the main difference between ARTY and BAI?

Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ARTY and 0.55% for BAI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 3.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.