ARMH vs. TDV
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and TDV (ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ARMH is actively managed, while TDV is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for TDV.
Performance
ARMH vs. TDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- -6.83%
- 1M
- -20.34%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDV
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 19.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -3.02% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | -2.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and TDV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TDV
ARMH vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMH | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, roughly equal to the maximum TDV drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and TDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.10% | -32.78% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.10% | -6.54% | -25.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.18% | -5.35% | -9.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.10% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.58% | 19.22% | +86.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.58% | 20.84% | +84.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.58% | 23.32% | +82.26% |
ARMH vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than TDV's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMH vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison
ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 1.05% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and TDV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for TDV.
TDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: Precidian and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.66% for TDV.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and TDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer