ARMH vs. STPZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and STPZ (PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARMH is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while STPZ is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y). ARMH is actively managed, while STPZ is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.80, they often move in opposite directions. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for STPZ.

Performance

ARMH vs. STPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ARMH

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

STPZ

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 1.77%
• 1Y: 4.51%
• 3Y*: 5.03%
• 5Y*: 2.90%
• 10Y*: 2.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMH vs. STPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	23.00%
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF	0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMH and STPZ is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	-0.80

Return for Risk

ARMH vs. STPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STPZ

STPZ Risk / Return Rank: 82
STPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
STPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
STPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 80
STPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
STPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMH vs. STPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARMH	STPZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.97	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	471,500.14	0.90	+471,499.24

Drawdowns

ARMH vs. STPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -1.61%, smaller than the maximum STPZ drawdown of -6.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and STPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARMH	STPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.61%	-6.77%	+5.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-6.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-6.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.11%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.40%	-1.31%	+0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARMH	STPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	113.00%	1.83%	+111.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	113.00%	3.29%	+109.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	113.00%	2.98%	+110.02%

ARMH vs. STPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than STPZ's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ARMH vs. STPZ - Dividend Comparison

ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF	4.10%	3.65%	1.97%	1.63%	5.88%	3.65%	1.86%	1.76%	2.23%	1.51%	0.65%	0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARMH and STPZ in my portfolio?

ARMH and STPZ have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ARMH or STPZ?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARMH or STPZ?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for STPZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARMH or STPZ?

STPZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

What is the main difference between ARMH and STPZ?

ARMH is categorized as Technology Equities, while STPZ is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.20% for STPZ.