STPZ vs. STIP
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP).
STPZ and STIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. STPZ is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y). It was launched on Aug 20, 2009. STIP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L). It was launched on Dec 1, 2010. Both STPZ and STIP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: STPZ or STIP.
Key characteristics
| STPZ | STIP | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 0.49% | 0.71% |
| 1Y Return | 2.39% | 2.94% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.28% | 2.01% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.74% | 3.13% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.72% | 1.98% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.72 | 1.08 |
| Daily Std Dev | 2.92% | 2.51% |
| Max Drawdown | -6.76% | -5.50% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.08% | -0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between STPZ and STIP is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
STPZ vs. STIP - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, STPZ achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than STIP's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, STPZ has underperformed STIP with an annualized return of 1.72%, while STIP has yielded a comparatively higher 1.98% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STPZ vs. STIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
STPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than STIP's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
STPZ vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
STPZ vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison
STPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than STIP's 2.70% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 1.63% | 1.63% | 5.88% | 3.65% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.39% | 1.51% | 0.65% | 0.49% | 0.86% | 0.09% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 2.70% | 2.84% | 6.04% | 4.15% | 1.40% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 0.31% |
Drawdowns
STPZ vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STPZ drawdown since its inception was -6.76%, which is greater than STIP's maximum drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STPZ and STIP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
STPZ vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) has a higher volatility of 0.67% compared to iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) at 0.58%. This indicates that STPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.