ARMH vs. FPRO
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and FPRO (Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARMH is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while FPRO is a REIT fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Their -0.61 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FPRO.
Performance
ARMH vs. FPRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -24.02%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FPRO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 13.72%
- YTD
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 17.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.99%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $185.31K | $454.05K | $691.73K | |
| $89.69K | $152.37K | $130.11K |
ARMH vs. FPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -22.64% |
FPRO Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF | 3.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and FPRO is -0.61, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. FPRO — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FPRO
ARMH vs. FPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMH | FPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. FPRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -48.81%, which is greater than FPRO's maximum drawdown of -32.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and FPRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | FPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.81% | -32.81% | -16.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.83% | -1.62% | -44.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.50% | -12.30% | -11.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.47% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. FPRO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | FPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.98% | 13.68% | +84.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.98% | 18.71% | +79.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.98% | 18.31% | +79.67% |
ARMH vs. FPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FPRO's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMH vs. FPRO - Dividend Comparison
ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FPRO Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF | 2.44% | 2.69% | 2.50% | 2.83% | 2.67% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and FPRO have a correlation of -0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FPRO.
FPRO has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
ARMH is categorized as Technology Equities, while FPRO is REIT. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.59% for FPRO.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and FPRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer