ARMH vs. FITE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE).

ARMH and FITE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ARMH is an actively managed fund by Precidian. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025. FITE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Future Security Index. It was launched on Dec 26, 2017.

Performance

ARMH vs. FITE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ARMH vs. FITE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	39.97%	-2.01%
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF	0.28%	36.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMH achieves a 39.97% return, which is significantly higher than FITE's 0.28% return.

ARMH

• 1D: 9.71%
• 1M: 20.77%
• YTD: 39.97%
• 6M: 9.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FITE

• 1D: 4.23%
• 1M: -3.24%
• YTD: 0.28%
• 6M: 0.05%
• 1Y: 36.53%
• 3Y*: 22.85%
• 5Y*: 12.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMH vs. FITE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FITE's 0.45% expense ratio.

FITE

SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

ARMH

Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF

Return for Risk

ARMH vs. FITE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FITE

FITE Risk / Return Rank: 75
FITE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FITE Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FITE Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FITE Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FITE Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMH vs. FITE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARMH	FITE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.62	+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between ARMH and FITE is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ARMH vs. FITE - Dividend Comparison

ARMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than FITE's 0.20% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	2.42%	2.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF	0.20%	0.23%	0.12%	0.13%	0.12%	0.92%	0.88%	0.44%	1.79%

Drawdowns

ARMH vs. FITE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -42.04%, which is greater than FITE's maximum drawdown of -36.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and FITE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARMH	FITE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.04%	-36.90%	-5.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.75%	-11.77%	-1.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.33%	-7.50%	-8.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARMH	FITE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.59%	27.13%	+23.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.59%	21.98%	+28.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.59%	22.94%	+27.65%