ARMH vs. BPH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARMH is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while BPH is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

ARMH vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ARMH

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMH vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	23.00%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMH and BPH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.40

Return for Risk

ARMH vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARMH	BPH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	471,500.14	4.91	+471,495.24

Drawdowns

ARMH vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -1.61%, smaller than the maximum BPH drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARMH	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.61%	-2.35%	+0.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.40%	-1.30%	+0.90%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARMH	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	113.00%	28.08%	+84.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	113.00%	28.08%	+84.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	113.00%	28.08%	+84.92%

ARMH vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ARMH and BPH have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ARMH vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARMH nor BPH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARMH and BPH in my portfolio?

ARMH and BPH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ARMH or BPH?

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARMH or BPH?

ARMH and BPH have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARMH or BPH?

ARMH and BPH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ARMH and BPH?

ARMH is categorized as Technology Equities, while BPH is Oil & Gas.