ARKW vs. PAMC
ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) and PAMC (Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. ARKW is actively managed, while PAMC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ARKW returned -0.92%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for PAMC. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ARKW charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PAMC.
Performance
ARKW vs. PAMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a -4.64% return, which is significantly lower than PAMC's 16.89% return.
ARKW
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- -4.64%
- 1Y
- -4.74%
- 3Y*
- 32.39%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.87%
PAMC
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 27.33%
- 3Y*
- 16.37%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.17M | $12.26M | $13.73M | |
| $181.46K | $141.60K | $352.24K |
ARKW vs. PAMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -4.64% | 38.93% | 42.27% | 96.89% | -67.49% | -18.85% | 78.56% |
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 16.89% | 1.54% | 26.20% | 19.30% | -12.15% | 13.15% | 34.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKW and PAMC is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.61 |
The correlation between ARKW and PAMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ARKW vs. PAMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKW
PAMC
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
ARKW
PAMC
Consumer Cyclical
ARKW
PAMC
Communication Services
ARKW
PAMC
Financial Services
ARKW
PAMC
Industrials
ARKW
PAMC
Basic Materials
ARKW
-
PAMC
Consumer Defensive
ARKW
-
PAMC
Energy
ARKW
-
PAMC
Healthcare
ARKW
-
PAMC
Real Estate
ARKW
-
PAMC
Utilities
ARKW
-
PAMC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKW vs. PAMC — Risk / Return Rank
ARKW
PAMC
ARKW vs. PAMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKW | PAMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.27 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 2.68 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 9.70 | -9.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKW vs. PAMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than PAMC's maximum drawdown of -27.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and PAMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKW | PAMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.52% | -27.04% | -53.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.21% | -10.24% | -25.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.21% | -26.07% | -10.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.36% | -26.61% | -50.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.57% | -2.25% | -21.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.95% | -7.32% | -16.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.38% | 2.83% | +16.55% |
Volatility
ARKW vs. PAMC - Volatility Comparison
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) at 4.35%. This indicates that ARKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKW | PAMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.38% | 4.35% | +5.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.80% | 14.15% | +11.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.40% | 18.88% | +14.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.79% | 20.22% | +23.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.84% | 20.62% | +17.22% |
ARKW vs. PAMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than PAMC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKW vs. PAMC - Dividend Comparison
ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than PAMC's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.67% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.11% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKW and PAMC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKW has higher volatility (9.38%) compared to PAMC (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs PAMC's -27.04%.
On 5-year performance, PAMC leads with 9.85% vs -0.92% for ARKW. On fees, PAMC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PAMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAMC has performed better with a 9.85% return vs -0.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAMC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.
ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.11% for PAMC.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.60% for PAMC.
PAMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKW and PAMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer