ARKF vs. LRNZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ARKF (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) and LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKF is a Blockchain fund actively managed by ARK, while LRNZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TrueMark Investments. Both are actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ARKF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for LRNZ.

Performance

ARKF vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ARKF

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 6.19%
• 6M: -16.15%
• YTD: -13.25%
• 1Y: -18.91%
• 3Y*: 20.97%
• 5Y*: -4.30%
• 10Y*: —

LRNZ

• 1D: -2.30%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKF vs. LRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF	-0.31%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	-3.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKF and LRNZ is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026	1.00

ARKF vs. LRNZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARKF	LRNZ
Technology	41.7%	82.1%
Financial Services	25.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	-
Communication Services	8.9%	2.9%
Healthcare	0.2%	15.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ARKF vs. LRNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKF

ARKF Risk / Return Rank: 5
ARKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ARKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ARKF Omega Ratio Rank: 5
ARKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ARKF Martin Ratio Rank: 5

LRNZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKF vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARKF	LRNZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.49	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.83	—	—

Drawdowns

ARKF vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKF drawdown since its inception was -78.63%, which is greater than LRNZ's maximum drawdown of -3.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKF and LRNZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARKF	LRNZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.63%	-3.01%	-75.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.97%	-3.01%	-31.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.97%	-1.87%	-33.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.71%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARKF	LRNZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.71%	17.72%	+15.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.98%	17.72%	+25.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.68%	17.72%	+21.96%

ARKF vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LRNZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARKF vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison

ARKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF	0.10%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	1.25%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARKF and LRNZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, ARKF and LRNZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ARKF or LRNZ?

On fees, LRNZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARKF or LRNZ?

LRNZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARKF or LRNZ?

ARKF has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.

What is the main difference between ARKF and LRNZ?

ARKF is categorized as Blockchain, while LRNZ is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and TrueMark Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKF and 0.68% for LRNZ.