PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARGT vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARGT vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARGT achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 4.96% return. Over the past 10 years, ARGT has outperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 17.46%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.25% annualized return.


ARGT

1D
-3.12%
1M
5.42%
YTD
3.65%
6M
0.81%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
33.61%
5Y*
26.82%
10Y*
17.46%

XYLD

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.00%
YTD
4.96%
6M
6.48%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
8.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARGT vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
3.65%11.51%63.46%53.64%11.80%3.83%14.58%14.50%-32.62%53.87%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.96%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ARGT and XYLD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013

0.49

The correlation between ARGT and XYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ARGT vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARGT
XYLD

Consumer Cyclical

26.3%
10.2%

Energy

22.2%
3.5%

Financial Services

13.7%
11.8%

Basic Materials

13.3%
1.8%

Industrials

8.3%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
4.9%

Utilities

5.1%
2.3%

Communication Services

2.9%
11.2%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.9%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Technology

-

35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ARGT
26.3%
XYLD
10.2%

Energy

ARGT
22.2%
XYLD
3.5%

Financial Services

ARGT
13.7%
XYLD
11.8%

Basic Materials

ARGT
13.3%
XYLD
1.8%

Industrials

ARGT
8.3%
XYLD
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

ARGT
6.9%
XYLD
4.9%

Utilities

ARGT
5.1%
XYLD
2.3%

Communication Services

ARGT
2.9%
XYLD
11.2%

Real Estate

ARGT
1.3%
XYLD
1.9%

Healthcare

ARGT

-

XYLD
8.5%

Technology

ARGT

-

XYLD
35.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARGT vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARGT
ARGT Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ARGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARGT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ARGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARGT Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARGT vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARGTXYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.16

2.71

-2.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.55

3.87

-3.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.64

-0.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

3.35

-3.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.57

17.84

-17.27

ARGT vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARGT Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARGT and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARGTXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

2.71

-2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.69

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.58

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.60

-0.30

Drawdowns

ARGT vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARGT drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARGT and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARGTXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.68%

-33.46%

-28.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.97%

-5.29%

-17.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.46%

-15.53%

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.14%

-18.66%

-16.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.68%

-33.46%

-28.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.96%

-0.15%

-7.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.05%

-3.72%

-18.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.20%

0.99%

+10.21%

Volatility

ARGT vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 0.88%. This indicates that ARGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARGTXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.43%

0.88%

+9.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.31%

5.37%

+14.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.70%

6.55%

+30.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.92%

11.22%

+20.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.44%

14.21%

+17.23%

ARGT vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ARGT and XYLD have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

ARGT vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

ARGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than XYLD's 10.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
0.81%0.84%1.41%1.59%2.45%0.93%0.28%1.21%1.34%0.49%0.36%0.89%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.52%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARGT and XYLD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARGT has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to XYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARGT dropped -61.68% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

On 10-year performance, ARGT leads with 17.46% vs 8.25% for XYLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARGT has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARGT and XYLD have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.52%, compared with 0.81% for ARGT.

ARGT is categorized as Latin America Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. ARGT tracks MSCI All Argentina 25/50, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARGT and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer