ARGT vs. SCHG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).

ARGT and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ARGT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Argentina 25/50. It was launched on Mar 2, 2011. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both ARGT and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ARGT vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ARGT vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ARGT Global X MSCI Argentina ETF	1.97%	11.51%	63.46%	53.64%	11.80%	3.83%	14.58%	14.50%	-32.62%	53.87%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	-9.73%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARGT achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, ARGT has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 18.45%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 16.95% annualized return.

ARGT

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 3.86%
• YTD: 1.97%
• 6M: 39.04%
• 1Y: 15.52%
• 3Y*: 35.18%
• 5Y*: 28.10%
• 10Y*: 18.45%

SCHG

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: -4.46%
• YTD: -9.73%
• 6M: -8.15%
• 1Y: 17.00%
• 3Y*: 22.30%
• 5Y*: 12.76%
• 10Y*: 16.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARGT vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARGT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

ARGT

Global X MSCI Argentina ETF

SCHG

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

Return for Risk

ARGT vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARGT

ARGT Risk / Return Rank: 25
ARGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
ARGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
ARGT Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ARGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
ARGT Martin Ratio Rank: 21

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 41
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARGT vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ARGT	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	0.76	-0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	1.24	-0.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.17	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.58	1.09	-0.52
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.33	3.71	-2.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ARGT vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARGT Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARGT and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARGT	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	0.76	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.57	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.79	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.79	-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between ARGT and SCHG is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ARGT vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

ARGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARGT Global X MSCI Argentina ETF	0.83%	0.84%	1.41%	1.59%	2.45%	0.93%	0.28%	1.21%	1.34%	0.49%	0.36%	0.89%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.43%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Drawdowns

ARGT vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARGT drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARGT and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARGT	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.68%	-34.59%	-27.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.46%	-16.41%	-12.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.14%	-34.59%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.68%	-34.59%	-27.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.45%	-12.51%	+3.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.19%	-5.22%	-16.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.35%	4.84%	+7.51%

Volatility

ARGT vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.77%. This indicates that ARGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARGT	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.69%	6.77%	+1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.97%	12.54%	+15.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.11%	22.45%	+16.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.76%	22.31%	+9.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.36%	21.51%	+9.85%