PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARB vs. RYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ARB vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ARB vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ARB
AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF
0.86%6.05%4.07%3.85%2.67%3.16%3.78%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
0.70%5.65%10.13%0.27%-13.03%22.13%33.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARB achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's 0.70% return.


ARB

1D
0.34%
1M
0.65%
YTD
0.86%
6M
1.58%
1Y
4.27%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*

RYLD

1D
2.12%
1M
-3.64%
YTD
0.70%
6M
5.49%
1Y
11.70%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ARB vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARB has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ARB vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARB
ARB Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ARB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARB Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ARB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARB Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARB vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARBRYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.54

0.72

+0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

1.13

+1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.19

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

0.92

+2.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.20

4.48

+12.72

ARB vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARB Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARB and RYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARBRYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

0.72

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.16

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.26

+0.69

Correlation

The correlation between ARB and RYLD is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ARB vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

ARB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than RYLD's 12.14% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ARB
AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF
0.43%0.43%1.12%0.00%4.18%0.00%2.87%0.00%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
12.14%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%

Drawdowns

ARB vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARB drawdown since its inception was -5.60%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARB and RYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ARBRYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-41.53%

+35.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.20%

-12.33%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.60%

-21.33%

+15.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.31%

+4.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-9.04%

+8.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

2.53%

-2.27%

Volatility

ARB vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) is 0.96%, while Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that ARB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ARBRYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

5.25%

-4.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.01%

9.08%

-7.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79%

16.39%

-13.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.37%

14.20%

-9.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.41%

17.38%

-12.97%