PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARB vs. HFND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARB vs. HFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) and Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARB achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than HFND's 9.46% return.


ARB

1D
0.20%
1M
0.13%
YTD
1.75%
6M
2.17%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
5.95%
5Y*
3.93%
10Y*

HFND

1D
0.81%
1M
3.36%
YTD
9.46%
6M
10.25%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
9.57%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARB vs. HFND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ARB
AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF
1.75%6.05%4.07%3.85%0.19%
HFND
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF
9.46%8.93%8.34%3.58%2.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ARB and HFND is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2022

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARB vs. HFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARB
ARB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ARB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARB Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ARB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARB Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

HFND
HFND Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFND Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFND Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARB vs. HFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) and Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARBHFNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

3.93

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.04

14.36

+2.68

ARB vs. HFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARB Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the HFND Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARB and HFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARB vs. HFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARB drawdown since its inception was -5.60%, smaller than the maximum HFND drawdown of -13.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARB and HFND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARBHFNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-13.31%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.07%

-4.94%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.13%

-13.31%

+11.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

0.00%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.94%

-2.08%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

1.35%

-1.07%

Volatility

ARB vs. HFND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) is 1.22%, while Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that ARB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARBHFNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

3.15%

-1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

8.00%

-5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10%

9.73%

-6.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.43%

9.52%

-5.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.41%

9.52%

-5.11%

ARB vs. HFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARB has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than HFND's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARB vs. HFND - Dividend Comparison

ARB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than HFND's 4.64% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ARB
AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF
0.42%0.43%1.12%0.00%4.18%0.00%2.87%
HFND
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF
4.64%5.08%3.70%1.41%0.43%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARB and HFND have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFND has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to ARB (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARB dropped -5.60% vs HFND's -13.31%.

On 3-year performance, HFND leads with 9.57% vs 5.95% for ARB. On fees, ARB is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, ARB has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HFND has performed better with a 9.57% return vs 5.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARB is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for HFND.

HFND has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 0.42% for ARB.

ARB is categorized as Hedge Fund, while HFND is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Water Island Capital Partners LP and Tidal ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for ARB and 1.22% for HFND.

HFND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARB and HFND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer