PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRD vs. QFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRD vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April (APRD) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


APRD

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QFLR

1D
-0.07%
1M
3.24%
YTD
6.83%
6M
5.81%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRD vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


APRD vs. QFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
APRD
QFLR

Technology

32.0%
50.8%

Financial Services

13.7%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
12.1%

Healthcare

10.5%
3.2%

Communication Services

9.9%
18.4%

Industrials

7.4%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
9.2%

Energy

3.2%
1.1%

Utilities

2.5%
1.5%

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%
0.0%

Technology

APRD
32.0%
QFLR
50.8%

Financial Services

APRD
13.7%
QFLR
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

APRD
11.6%
QFLR
12.1%

Healthcare

APRD
10.5%
QFLR
3.2%

Communication Services

APRD
9.9%
QFLR
18.4%

Industrials

APRD
7.4%
QFLR
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

APRD
5.5%
QFLR
9.2%

Energy

APRD
3.2%
QFLR
1.1%

Utilities

APRD
2.5%
QFLR
1.5%

Real Estate

APRD
2.1%
QFLR

-

Basic Materials

APRD
1.7%
QFLR
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRD vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRD

QFLR
QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRD vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April (APRD) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

APRD vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRDQFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.39

Drawdowns

APRD vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRD drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRD and QFLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRDQFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-13.97%

+13.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.54%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-2.49%

+2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

Volatility

APRD vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRDQFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

11.27%

-11.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

12.61%

-12.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

12.61%

-12.61%

APRD vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRD has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

APRD vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRD nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
APRD
Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
0.00%0.02%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, APRD is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRD is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

APRD and QFLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

APRD is categorized as Options Trading, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRD and 0.89% for QFLR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRD and QFLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer