PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRD vs. BUFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRD vs. BUFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April (APRD) and FT Cboe Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF (BUFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


APRD

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFG

1D
0.03%
1M
2.54%
YTD
6.72%
6M
7.58%
1Y
18.52%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRD vs. BUFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


APRD vs. BUFG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
APRD
BUFG

Technology

32.0%
36.2%

Financial Services

13.7%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
10.1%

Healthcare

10.5%
8.4%

Communication Services

9.9%
10.9%

Industrials

7.4%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
4.9%

Energy

3.2%
3.5%

Utilities

2.5%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.8%

Technology

APRD
32.0%
BUFG
36.2%

Financial Services

APRD
13.7%
BUFG
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

APRD
11.6%
BUFG
10.1%

Healthcare

APRD
10.5%
BUFG
8.4%

Communication Services

APRD
9.9%
BUFG
10.9%

Industrials

APRD
7.4%
BUFG
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

APRD
5.5%
BUFG
4.9%

Energy

APRD
3.2%
BUFG
3.5%

Utilities

APRD
2.5%
BUFG
2.3%

Real Estate

APRD
2.1%
BUFG
1.9%

Basic Materials

APRD
1.7%
BUFG
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRD vs. BUFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRD

BUFG
BUFG Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BUFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRD vs. BUFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April (APRD) and FT Cboe Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF (BUFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

APRD vs. BUFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRDBUFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

Drawdowns

APRD vs. BUFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRD drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BUFG drawdown of -17.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRD and BUFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRDBUFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-17.62%

+17.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-3.62%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

Volatility

APRD vs. BUFG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRDBUFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

7.63%

-7.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

11.84%

-11.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

11.84%

-11.84%

APRD vs. BUFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRD has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFG's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

APRD vs. BUFG - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRD nor BUFG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, APRD is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRD is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for BUFG.

APRD and BUFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRD and 1.05% for BUFG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRD and BUFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer