APPX vs. GUSH
APPX (Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF) and GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. APPX is actively managed, while GUSH is passively managed. Over the past year, APPX returned -6.08% vs 84.57% for GUSH. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. APPX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for GUSH.
Performance
APPX vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APPX achieves a -53.50% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 73.60% return.
APPX
- 1D
- -3.79%
- 1M
- 30.52%
- YTD
- -53.50%
- 6M
- -55.75%
- 1Y
- -6.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUSH
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -11.53%
- YTD
- 73.60%
- 6M
- 49.22%
- 1Y
- 84.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- -36.93%
APPX vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
APPX Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF | -53.50% | 329.60% |
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 73.60% | 18.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between APPX and GUSH is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APPX vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank
APPX
GUSH
APPX vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF (APPX) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APPX | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.25 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 2.94 | -3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 6.75 | -6.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APPX | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 1.54 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | -0.44 | +1.06 |
Drawdowns
APPX vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APPX drawdown since its inception was -82.40%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APPX and GUSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APPX | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.40% | -99.98% | +17.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.40% | -28.94% | -53.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -63.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.84% | -99.79% | +35.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.32% | -92.92% | +55.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.83% | 12.58% | +36.25% |
Volatility
APPX vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF (APPX) has a higher volatility of 41.73% compared to Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) at 20.18%. This indicates that APPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APPX | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.73% | 20.18% | +21.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 121.72% | 43.32% | +78.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 141.05% | 55.49% | +85.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 140.44% | 68.21% | +72.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 140.44% | 93.70% | +46.74% |
APPX vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
APPX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
APPX vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison
APPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.17%, more than GUSH's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APPX Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF | 20.17% | 9.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.44% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APPX and GUSH have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APPX has higher volatility (41.73%) compared to GUSH (20.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APPX dropped -82.40% vs GUSH's -99.98%.
On 1-year performance, GUSH leads with 84.57% vs -6.08% for APPX. On fees, GUSH is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, GUSH has been the lower-risk option at 20.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GUSH has performed better with a 84.57% return vs -6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GUSH is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for APPX.
APPX has the higher dividend yield at 20.17%, compared with 1.44% for GUSH.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for APPX and 1.17% for GUSH.
GUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APPX and GUSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer