PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APPX vs. QQQP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APPX vs. QQQP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF (APPX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APPX achieves a -68.16% return, which is significantly lower than QQQP's 33.67% return.


APPX

1D
-0.29%
1M
-9.85%
YTD
-68.16%
6M
-73.24%
1Y
7.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQP

1D
-0.56%
1M
4.47%
YTD
33.67%
6M
31.35%
1Y
73.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APPX vs. QQQP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
APPX
Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF
-68.16%344.96%
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
33.67%60.80%

Correlation

The correlation between APPX and QQQP is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APPX vs. QQQP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APPX
APPX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
APPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
APPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
APPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
APPX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQP
QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APPX vs. QQQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF (APPX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APPXQQQPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.34

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

2.92

-2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.15

10.48

-10.32

APPX vs. QQQP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the QQQP Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APPX and QQQP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APPX vs. QQQP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APPX drawdown since its inception was -82.40%, which is greater than QQQP's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APPX and QQQP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APPXQQQPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.40%

-42.50%

-39.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.40%

-25.35%

-57.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.24%

-1.94%

-73.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-7.26%

-31.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.64%

7.04%

+42.60%

Volatility

APPX vs. QQQP - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF (APPX) has a higher volatility of 41.37% compared to Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) at 14.48%. This indicates that APPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APPXQQQPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.37%

14.48%

+26.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

123.06%

27.11%

+95.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

141.61%

34.24%

+107.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

139.99%

44.27%

+95.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

139.99%

44.27%

+95.72%

APPX vs. QQQP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both APPX and QQQP have an expense ratio of 1.30%.


Dividends

APPX vs. QQQP - Dividend Comparison

APPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.47%, while QQQP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
APPX
Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF
29.47%9.38%
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


APPX and QQQP have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APPX has higher volatility (41.37%) compared to QQQP (14.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APPX dropped -82.40% vs QQQP's -42.50%.

On 1-year performance, QQQP leads with 73.51% vs 7.60% for APPX. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQP has been the lower-risk option at 14.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQP has performed better with a 73.51% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APPX and QQQP have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

APPX has the higher dividend yield at 29.47%, compared with 0.00% for QQQP.

QQQP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APPX and QQQP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer