APO vs. BAM
APO (Apollo Global Management, Inc.) and BAM (Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 3 years, APO returned 22.69%/yr vs 16.64%/yr for BAM. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
APO vs. BAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APO achieves a -6.75% return, which is significantly higher than BAM's -8.16% return.
APO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- -6.75%
- 6M
- -8.82%
- 1Y
- 2.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 20.72%
- 10Y*
- 29.16%
BAM
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- -8.16%
- 6M
- -10.55%
- 1Y
- -10.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APO vs. BAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | -6.75% | -11.12% | 79.87% | 49.44% | 1.45% |
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | -8.16% | -0.24% | 39.70% | 45.61% | -10.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between APO and BAM is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2022 | 0.59 |
The correlation between APO and BAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
APO:
$79.66B
BAM:
$76.32B
APO:
$3.58
BAM:
$1.55
APO:
37.38
BAM:
30.39
APO:
0.10
BAM:
0.05
APO:
2.71
BAM:
15.08
APO:
4.29
BAM:
6.79
APO:
$29.68B
BAM:
$5.08B
APO:
$26.52B
BAM:
$3.26B
APO:
$9.28B
BAM:
$2.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APO vs. BAM — Risk / Return Rank
APO
BAM
APO vs. BAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APO | BAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.95 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | -0.43 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | -0.77 | +0.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APO vs. BAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APO drawdown since its inception was -56.99%, which is greater than BAM's maximum drawdown of -30.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APO and BAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APO | BAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.99% | -30.37% | -26.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.97% | -30.37% | -4.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.82% | -30.37% | -12.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.36% | -22.66% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.39% | -8.86% | -7.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.70% | 16.80% | -0.10% |
Volatility
APO vs. BAM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) is 8.49%, while Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) has a volatility of 10.83%. This indicates that APO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APO | BAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.49% | 10.83% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.89% | 22.75% | +4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.44% | 29.82% | +5.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.11% | 30.18% | +6.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.83% | 30.18% | +7.65% |
Dividends
APO vs. BAM - Dividend Comparison
APO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than BAM's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 1.56% | 1.38% | 1.10% | 1.81% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 4.72% | 4.23% | 7.86% | 5.53% | 6.46% | 12.91% |
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 3.99% | 3.34% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
APO vs. BAM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
APO vs. BAM - Profitability Comparison
APO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.93B and revenue of 4.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
BAM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
APO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 330.00M and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
BAM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
APO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a net income of -1.91B and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in a net margin of -38.7%.
BAM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. reported a net income of 617.00M and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in a net margin of 46.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
APO and BAM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAM has higher volatility (10.83%) compared to APO (8.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APO dropped -56.99% vs BAM's -30.37%.
APO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APO and BAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer