APO vs. OWL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL).

Performance

APO vs. OWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

APO vs. OWL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc.	-22.72%	-11.12%	79.87%	49.44%	-9.59%	53.25%	2.40%
OWL Blue Owl Capital Inc.	-37.68%	-32.83%	61.76%	47.40%	-26.29%	32.18%	11.57%

Fundamentals

Market Cap APO : $66.63B OWL : $14.35B
EPS APO : $5.80 OWL : $0.08
PE Ratio APO : 19.20 OWL : 112.00
PEG Ratio APO : 0.05 OWL : 0.40
PS Ratio APO : 2.08 OWL : 3.08
PB Ratio APO : 3.04 OWL : 2.32
Total Revenue (TTM) APO : $32.06B OWL : $2.87B
Gross Profit (TTM) APO : $31.03B OWL : $1.56B
EBITDA (TTM) APO : $8.01B OWL : $841.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APO achieves a -22.72% return, which is significantly higher than OWL's -37.68% return.

APO

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 6.52%
• YTD: -22.72%
• 6M: -15.72%
• 1Y: -17.39%
• 3Y*: 22.86%
• 5Y*: 20.87%
• 10Y*: 25.51%

OWL

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -13.46%
• YTD: -37.68%
• 6M: -44.19%
• 1Y: -51.77%
• 3Y*: -1.86%
• 5Y*: 2.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

APO vs. OWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APO

APO Risk / Return Rank: 23
APO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
APO Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
APO Omega Ratio Rank: 23
APO Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
APO Martin Ratio Rank: 20

OWL

OWL Risk / Return Rank: 4
OWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
OWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
OWL Omega Ratio Rank: 5
OWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
OWL Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APO vs. OWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APO	OWL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.40	-1.10	+0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.31	-1.68	+1.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	0.79	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.50	-0.91	+0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.17	-2.06	+0.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APO vs. OWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APO Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is higher than the OWL Sharpe Ratio of -1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APO and OWL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APO	OWL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40	-1.10	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.05	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.04	+0.52

Correlation

The correlation between APO and OWL is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

APO vs. OWL - Dividend Comparison

APO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than OWL's 9.86% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc.	1.83%	1.38%	1.10%	1.81%	2.51%	2.90%	4.72%	4.23%	7.86%	5.53%	6.46%	12.91%
OWL Blue Owl Capital Inc.	9.86%	5.72%	2.92%	3.69%	4.06%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

APO vs. OWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APO drawdown since its inception was -56.99%, smaller than the maximum OWL drawdown of -65.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APO and OWL.

Drawdown Indicators

	APO	OWL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.99%	-65.58%	+8.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.97%	-56.93%	+21.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.82%	-65.58%	+22.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.48%	-63.50%	+27.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.21%	-22.71%	+6.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.85%	25.30%	-10.45%

Volatility

APO vs. OWL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) is 10.58%, while Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) has a volatility of 11.49%. This indicates that APO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APO	OWL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.58%	11.49%	-0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.55%	32.40%	-4.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.23%	47.08%	-3.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.72%	42.88%	-6.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.70%	42.29%	-4.59%

Financials

APO vs. OWL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Blue Owl Capital Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

APO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 9.88B and revenue of 9.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

OWL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Blue Owl Capital Inc. reported a gross profit of 442.17M and revenue of 755.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.5%.

APO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 916.00M and revenue of 9.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.3%.

OWL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Blue Owl Capital Inc. reported an operating income of 203.96M and revenue of 755.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.0%.

APO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a net income of 684.00M and revenue of 9.88B, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.

OWL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Blue Owl Capital Inc. reported a net income of 47.67M and revenue of 755.60M, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.