PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLE vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APLE vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLE achieves a 44.57% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 9.86% return.


APLE

1D
-0.06%
1M
15.34%
YTD
44.57%
6M
44.69%
1Y
53.03%
3Y*
12.71%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
4.49%

QQQI

1D
-2.87%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
9.86%
6M
8.75%
1Y
24.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APLE vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
APLE
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
44.57%-16.61%-1.80%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
9.86%18.62%19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between APLE and QQQI is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APLE vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APLE
APLE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
APLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
APLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APLE vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APLEQQQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

2.60

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.15

11.10

-1.95

APLE vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APLE Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLE and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APLE vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLE drawdown since its inception was -71.83%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLE and QQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APLEQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.83%

-20.00%

-51.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.49%

-9.61%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-3.32%

+3.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.35%

-2.20%

-10.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

2.25%

+3.56%

Volatility

APLE vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) is 5.66%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 7.63%. This indicates that APLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APLEQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

7.63%

-1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.61%

11.99%

+4.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.92%

14.79%

+8.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.26%

17.53%

+9.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.57%

17.53%

+17.04%

Dividends

APLE vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

APLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, less than QQQI's 14.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APLE
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
5.78%8.10%6.58%6.08%4.82%0.25%2.32%6.77%9.12%5.61%6.01%4.01%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
14.97%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


APLE and QQQI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQI has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to APLE (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLE dropped -71.83% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

APLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APLE and QQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer