APIE vs. DBAW
APIE (ActivePassive International Equity ETF) and DBAW (Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. APIE is actively managed, while DBAW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, APIE returned 17.90%/yr vs 21.15%/yr for DBAW. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. APIE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DBAW.
Performance
APIE vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APIE achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly lower than DBAW's 16.12% return.
APIE
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 8.11%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- 22.79%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBAW
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 16.12%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 36.60%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
APIE vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APIE ActivePassive International Equity ETF | 8.11% | 31.46% | 7.37% | 7.98% |
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF | 16.12% | 26.47% | 14.35% | 8.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between APIE and DBAW is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023 | 0.82 |
The correlation between APIE and DBAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
APIE vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
APIE
DBAW
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
APIE
DBAW
Financial Services
APIE
DBAW
Industrials
APIE
DBAW
Consumer Cyclical
APIE
DBAW
Healthcare
APIE
DBAW
Communication Services
APIE
DBAW
Consumer Defensive
APIE
DBAW
Basic Materials
APIE
DBAW
Energy
APIE
DBAW
Utilities
APIE
DBAW
Real Estate
APIE
DBAW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APIE vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank
APIE
DBAW
APIE vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive International Equity ETF (APIE) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APIE | DBAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.55 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 4.09 | -2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | 16.97 | -10.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APIE | DBAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 2.86 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.63 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
APIE vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APIE drawdown since its inception was -15.94%, smaller than the maximum DBAW drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APIE and DBAW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APIE | DBAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -31.44% | +15.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.41% | -9.00% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.94% | -14.11% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -0.51% | -1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.76% | -5.00% | +2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 2.16% | +1.21% |
Volatility
APIE vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison
ActivePassive International Equity ETF (APIE) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) at 4.71%. This indicates that APIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APIE | DBAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 4.71% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.05% | 11.00% | +2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.16% | 12.88% | +3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 13.74% | +3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 15.28% | +1.55% |
APIE vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison
APIE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
APIE vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison
APIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than DBAW's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APIE ActivePassive International Equity ETF | 3.43% | 3.71% | 2.14% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF | 3.29% | 3.83% | 1.70% | 3.45% | 8.81% | 2.05% | 2.08% | 2.91% | 2.93% | 2.41% | 1.99% | 5.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APIE and DBAW have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APIE has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to DBAW (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APIE dropped -15.94% vs DBAW's -31.44%.
On 3-year performance, DBAW leads with 21.15% vs 17.90% for APIE. On fees, DBAW is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, DBAW has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 21.15% return vs 17.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBAW is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for APIE.
APIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 3.29% for DBAW.
They also come from different issuers: ActivePassive and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for APIE and 0.41% for DBAW.
DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APIE and DBAW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer