APIE vs. XME

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

APIE (ActivePassive International Equity ETF) and XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APIE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by ActivePassive, while XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. APIE is actively managed, while XME is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, APIE returned 18.28%/yr vs 32.34%/yr for XME. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. APIE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XME.

Performance

APIE vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ActivePassive International Equity ETF (APIE) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APIE achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly higher than XME's 7.18% return.

APIE

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 9.17%
• 6M: 9.79%
• 1Y: 26.18%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XME

• 1D: -3.75%
• 1M: -5.21%
• YTD: 7.18%
• 6M: 2.81%
• 1Y: 68.16%
• 3Y*: 32.34%
• 5Y*: 21.39%
• 10Y*: 18.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APIE vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
APIE ActivePassive International Equity ETF	9.17%	31.46%	7.37%	7.64%
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	7.18%	83.47%	-4.54%	23.86%

Correlation

The correlation between APIE and XME is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023	0.55

The correlation between APIE and XME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

APIE vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	APIE	XME
Technology	22.7%	2.2%
Financial Services	19.8%	-
Industrials	14.0%	0.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	-
Healthcare	9.2%	-
Communication Services	7.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	0.8%
Basic Materials	5.4%	76.3%
Energy	2.7%	22.5%
Utilities	2.4%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

APIE vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APIE

APIE Risk / Return Rank: 45
APIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
APIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
APIE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
APIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
APIE Martin Ratio Rank: 47

XME

XME Risk / Return Rank: 54
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 50
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APIE vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive International Equity ETF (APIE) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	APIE	XME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.89	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	2.40	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.31	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	3.03	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.75	7.40	+0.35

APIE vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the XME Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APIE and XME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

APIE vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APIE drawdown since its inception was -15.94%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APIE and XME.

Drawdown Indicators

	APIE	XME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.94%	-85.89%	+69.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.41%	-22.60%	+10.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.94%	-30.47%	+14.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.27%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-16.45%	+15.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.74%	-44.05%	+41.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	9.24%	-5.85%

Volatility

APIE vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ActivePassive International Equity ETF (APIE) is 5.99%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 14.26%. This indicates that APIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APIE	XME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.99%	14.26%	-8.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.88%	28.34%	-14.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.81%	36.35%	-19.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.94%	32.76%	-15.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.94%	32.91%	-15.97%

APIE vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison

APIE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

APIE vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

APIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than XME's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
APIE ActivePassive International Equity ETF	3.40%	3.71%	2.14%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	0.34%	0.38%	0.65%	1.00%	1.64%	0.70%	0.99%	2.43%	2.23%	1.15%	1.02%	2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APIE and XME in my portfolio?

APIE and XME have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APIE or XME?

XME has higher volatility (14.26%) compared to APIE (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APIE dropped -15.94% vs XME's -85.89%.

Which ETF is better, APIE or XME?

On 3-year performance, XME leads with 32.34% vs 18.28% for APIE. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, APIE has been the lower-risk option at 5.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APIE or XME?

Over the 3-year period, XME has performed better with a 32.34% return vs 18.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APIE or XME?

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for APIE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APIE or XME?

APIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 0.34% for XME.

What is the main difference between APIE and XME?

APIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XME is Materials. They also come from different issuers: ActivePassive and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for APIE and 0.35% for XME.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.