APH vs. CIFR
APH (Amphenol Corporation) and CIFR (Cipher Mining Inc.) are both stocks. APH operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while CIFR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, APH returned 55.57%/yr vs 119.40%/yr for CIFR. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APH vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly lower than CIFR's 64.57% return.
APH
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- 12.16%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 54.90%
- 3Y*
- 55.57%
- 5Y*
- 34.64%
- 10Y*
- 26.67%
CIFR
- 1D
- 8.20%
- 1M
- 18.20%
- YTD
- 64.57%
- 6M
- 24.69%
- 1Y
- 522.82%
- 3Y*
- 119.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APH vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 6.47% | 96.08% | 41.30% | 31.85% | -11.96% | 14.18% |
CIFR Cipher Mining Inc. | 64.57% | 218.10% | 12.35% | 637.50% | -87.90% | -54.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between APH and CIFR is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2021 | 0.33 |
Fundamentals
APH:
$185.20B
CIFR:
$9.84B
APH:
$4.58
CIFR:
-$2.33
APH:
7.11
CIFR:
53.38
APH:
13.25
CIFR:
13.78
APH:
$25.90B
CIFR:
$174.98M
APH:
$9.67B
CIFR:
-$172.84M
APH:
$7.45B
CIFR:
-$169.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APH vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank
APH
CIFR
APH vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APH | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.45 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 10.27 | -8.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | 20.60 | -15.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APH | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 4.86 | -3.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.16 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
APH vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, smaller than the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and CIFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APH | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -97.16% | +33.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.19% | -51.38% | +23.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.19% | -71.74% | +43.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.45% | -7.61% | -5.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.56% | -66.47% | +52.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.87% | 25.55% | -14.68% |
Volatility
APH vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amphenol Corporation (APH) is 16.86%, while Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a volatility of 27.70%. This indicates that APH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APH | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.86% | 27.70% | -10.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | 70.95% | -34.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.97% | 108.62% | -67.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.54% | 122.03% | -91.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.83% | 122.03% | -94.20% |
Dividends
APH vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison
APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while CIFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.58% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% |
CIFR Cipher Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
APH vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Cipher Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
APH and CIFR have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIFR has higher volatility (27.70%) compared to APH (16.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APH dropped -63.41% vs CIFR's -97.16%.
CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APH and CIFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer