PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APH vs. CIFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APH vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly lower than CIFR's 64.57% return.


APH

1D
3.45%
1M
12.16%
YTD
6.47%
6M
2.93%
1Y
54.90%
3Y*
55.57%
5Y*
34.64%
10Y*
26.67%

CIFR

1D
8.20%
1M
18.20%
YTD
64.57%
6M
24.69%
1Y
522.82%
3Y*
119.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APH vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
APH
Amphenol Corporation
6.47%96.08%41.30%31.85%-11.96%14.18%
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
64.57%218.10%12.35%637.50%-87.90%-54.92%

Correlation

The correlation between APH and CIFR is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2021

0.33

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APH:

$185.20B

CIFR:

$9.84B

EPS

APH:

$4.58

CIFR:

-$2.33

PS Ratio

APH:

7.11

CIFR:

53.38

PB Ratio

APH:

13.25

CIFR:

13.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

APH:

$25.90B

CIFR:

$174.98M

Gross Profit (TTM)

APH:

$9.67B

CIFR:

-$172.84M

EBITDA (TTM)

APH:

$7.45B

CIFR:

-$169.22M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APH vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APH
APH Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
APH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
APH Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
APH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
APH Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

CIFR
CIFR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APH vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APHCIFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.45

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

10.27

-8.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

20.60

-15.53

APH vs. CIFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APH Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the CIFR Sharpe Ratio of 4.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APH and CIFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APHCIFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

4.86

-3.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.16

+0.47

Drawdowns

APH vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, smaller than the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and CIFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APHCIFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-97.16%

+33.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.19%

-51.38%

+23.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.19%

-71.74%

+43.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.45%

-7.61%

-5.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-66.47%

+52.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.87%

25.55%

-14.68%

Volatility

APH vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amphenol Corporation (APH) is 16.86%, while Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a volatility of 27.70%. This indicates that APH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APHCIFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.86%

27.70%

-10.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.53%

70.95%

-34.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.97%

108.62%

-67.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.54%

122.03%

-91.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.83%

122.03%

-94.20%

Dividends

APH vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison

APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while CIFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APH
Amphenol Corporation
0.58%0.55%0.79%1.07%1.06%0.89%0.80%0.89%1.09%0.80%0.86%1.01%
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

APH vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Cipher Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
7.62B
0
(APH) Total Revenue
(CIFR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


APH and CIFR have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIFR has higher volatility (27.70%) compared to APH (16.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APH dropped -63.41% vs CIFR's -97.16%.

CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APH and CIFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer