APDFX vs. PHYL
APDFX (Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class) and PHYL (PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, APDFX returned 4.19%/yr vs 4.00%/yr for PHYL. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. APDFX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PHYL.
Performance
APDFX vs. PHYL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APDFX achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than PHYL's 1.62% return.
APDFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 5.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.04%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- 6.44%
PHYL
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 6.79%
- 3Y*
- 9.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.00%
- 10Y*
- —
APDFX vs. PHYL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APDFX Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class | 0.94% | 8.32% | 8.46% | 15.98% | -10.57% | 3.99% | 9.67% | 14.84% | -4.67% |
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF | 1.62% | 9.65% | 8.45% | 11.91% | -11.80% | 6.20% | 6.31% | 16.77% | -4.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between APDFX and PHYL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018 | 0.62 |
The correlation between APDFX and PHYL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APDFX vs. PHYL — Risk / Return Rank
APDFX
PHYL
APDFX vs. PHYL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) and PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APDFX | PHYL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.41 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 2.55 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.21 | 11.57 | -2.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APDFX vs. PHYL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APDFX drawdown since its inception was -21.52%, roughly equal to the maximum PHYL drawdown of -22.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APDFX and PHYL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APDFX | PHYL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.52% | -22.07% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.75% | -2.68% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.30% | -4.53% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.64% | -16.11% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.28% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.13% | -3.05% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 0.59% | +0.02% |
Volatility
APDFX vs. PHYL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) is 0.80%, while PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) has a volatility of 1.06%. This indicates that APDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHYL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APDFX | PHYL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.80% | 1.06% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.40% | 2.73% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02% | 3.35% | -0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.95% | 5.70% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.24% | 7.64% | -2.40% |
APDFX vs. PHYL - Expense Ratio Comparison
APDFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PHYL's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
APDFX vs. PHYL - Dividend Comparison
APDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, more than PHYL's 6.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APDFX Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class | 7.06% | 6.86% | 7.27% | 7.39% | 6.34% | 5.41% | 5.42% | 6.94% | 7.17% | 8.01% | 6.70% | 7.48% |
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF | 6.99% | 7.05% | 8.28% | 7.62% | 6.55% | 6.13% | 7.51% | 7.31% | 1.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APDFX and PHYL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHYL has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to APDFX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APDFX dropped -21.52% vs PHYL's -22.07%.
PHYL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APDFX and PHYL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer