APDFX vs. PHYZX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

APDFX (Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class) and PHYZX (PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, APDFX returned 6.09%/yr vs 5.60%/yr for PHYZX. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. APDFX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for PHYZX.

Performance

APDFX vs. PHYZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) and PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z (PHYZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APDFX achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than PHYZX's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, APDFX has outperformed PHYZX with an annualized return of 6.09%, while PHYZX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.60% annualized return.

APDFX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.55%
• 6M: 0.28%
• YTD: 0.86%
• 1Y: 3.70%
• 3Y*: 8.25%
• 5Y*: 4.07%
• 10Y*: 6.09%
• ALL TIME*: 5.65%

PHYZX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -1.04%
• 6M: 0.53%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 1Y: 4.15%
• 3Y*: 7.95%
• 5Y*: 3.59%
• 10Y*: 5.60%
• ALL TIME*: 6.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
APDFX Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PHYZX PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

APDFX vs. PHYZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
APDFX Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class	0.86%	8.32%	8.46%	15.98%	-10.57%	3.99%	9.67%	14.84%	-1.40%	9.01%
PHYZX PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z	1.11%	9.04%	8.37%	12.23%	-12.31%	5.83%	7.73%	16.14%	-1.25%	7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between APDFX and PHYZX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014	0.80

The correlation between APDFX and PHYZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

APDFX vs. PHYZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

APDFX

APDFX Risk / Return Rank: 60
APDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
APDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
APDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
APDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
APDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

PHYZX

PHYZX Risk / Return Rank: 62
PHYZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
PHYZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
PHYZX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
PHYZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
PHYZX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

APDFX vs. PHYZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) and PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z (PHYZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	APDFX	PHYZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.33	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	2.30	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.31	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	1.94	-0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.86	7.98	-1.12

APDFX vs. PHYZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APDFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the PHYZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APDFX and PHYZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

APDFX vs. PHYZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APDFX drawdown since its inception was -21.52%, smaller than the maximum PHYZX drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APDFX and PHYZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	APDFX	PHYZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.52%	-28.57%	+7.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.75%	-2.47%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.30%	-3.76%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.64%	-16.09%	+1.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.52%	-21.09%	-0.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-1.04%	+0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.11%	-2.75%	+0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.62%	0.60%	+0.02%

Volatility

APDFX vs. PHYZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) is 0.47%, while PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z (PHYZX) has a volatility of 0.67%. This indicates that APDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHYZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APDFX	PHYZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.47%	0.67%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.40%	2.90%	-0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.97%	3.59%	-0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.95%	5.10%	-0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.21%	5.49%	-0.28%

APDFX vs. PHYZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APDFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PHYZX's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

APDFX vs. PHYZX - Dividend Comparison

APDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than PHYZX's 6.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
APDFX Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class	6.37%	6.86%	7.27%	7.39%	6.34%	5.41%	5.42%	6.94%	7.17%	8.01%	6.70%	7.48%
PHYZX PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z	6.46%	6.95%	7.37%	7.00%	6.15%	6.08%	8.35%	6.21%	6.55%	6.25%	6.36%	6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APDFX and PHYZX in my portfolio?

APDFX and PHYZX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APDFX or PHYZX?

PHYZX has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to APDFX (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APDFX dropped -21.52% vs PHYZX's -28.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.