PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APDFX vs. BUFHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APDFX vs. BUFHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) and Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APDFX achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than BUFHX's 2.08% return. Over the past 10 years, APDFX has outperformed BUFHX with an annualized return of 6.09%, while BUFHX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.20% annualized return.


APDFX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.55%
6M
0.28%
YTD
0.86%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
4.07%
10Y*
6.09%
ALL TIME*
5.65%

BUFHX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.11%
6M
1.25%
YTD
2.08%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
7.67%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
5.20%
ALL TIME*
6.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

APDFX vs. BUFHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APDFX
Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class
0.86%8.32%8.46%15.98%-10.57%3.99%9.67%14.84%-1.40%9.01%
BUFHX
Buffalo High Yield Fund
2.08%5.11%10.35%11.68%-5.53%5.52%9.26%12.33%-2.26%5.98%

Correlation

The correlation between APDFX and BUFHX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014

0.66

The correlation between APDFX and BUFHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APDFX vs. BUFHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

APDFX
APDFX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
APDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
APDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
APDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
APDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFHX
BUFHX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BUFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

APDFX vs. BUFHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) and Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APDFXBUFHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.28

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

1.60

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.86

6.70

+0.16

APDFX vs. BUFHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APDFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the BUFHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APDFX and BUFHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APDFX vs. BUFHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APDFX drawdown since its inception was -21.52%, smaller than the maximum BUFHX drawdown of -26.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APDFX and BUFHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APDFXBUFHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.52%

-26.01%

+4.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-2.13%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.30%

-3.83%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.64%

-9.98%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.52%

-18.74%

-2.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.30%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.11%

-2.02%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

0.51%

+0.11%

Volatility

APDFX vs. BUFHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) is 0.47%, while Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX) has a volatility of 0.56%. This indicates that APDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APDFXBUFHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

0.56%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.40%

2.00%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97%

2.52%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.95%

3.14%

+1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.21%

4.02%

+1.19%

APDFX vs. BUFHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APDFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFHX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

APDFX vs. BUFHX - Dividend Comparison

APDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than BUFHX's 7.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APDFX
Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class
6.37%6.86%7.27%7.39%6.34%5.41%5.42%6.94%7.17%8.01%6.70%7.48%
BUFHX
Buffalo High Yield Fund
7.07%6.84%8.03%6.41%8.05%7.24%4.11%4.21%5.17%4.57%3.85%5.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


APDFX and BUFHX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFHX has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to APDFX (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APDFX dropped -21.52% vs BUFHX's -26.01%.

APDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APDFX and BUFHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer