PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APDFX vs. BUFHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APDFX vs. BUFHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) and Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APDFX achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than BUFHX's 1.99% return. Over the past 10 years, APDFX has outperformed BUFHX with an annualized return of 6.44%, while BUFHX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.39% annualized return.


APDFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.83%
YTD
0.94%
6M
1.66%
1Y
5.59%
3Y*
9.04%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
6.44%

BUFHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.19%
1Y
4.89%
3Y*
8.27%
5Y*
4.85%
10Y*
5.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APDFX vs. BUFHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APDFX
Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class
0.94%8.32%8.46%15.98%-10.57%3.99%9.67%14.84%-1.40%9.01%
BUFHX
Buffalo High Yield Fund
1.99%5.11%10.35%11.68%-5.53%5.52%9.26%12.33%-2.26%5.98%

Correlation

The correlation between APDFX and BUFHX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014

0.66

The correlation between APDFX and BUFHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APDFX vs. BUFHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APDFX
APDFX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
APDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
APDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
APDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
APDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFHX
BUFHX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BUFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APDFX vs. BUFHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) and Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APDFXBUFHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.43

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.35

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.21

9.94

-0.73

APDFX vs. BUFHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APDFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the BUFHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APDFX and BUFHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APDFX vs. BUFHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APDFX drawdown since its inception was -21.52%, smaller than the maximum BUFHX drawdown of -26.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APDFX and BUFHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APDFXBUFHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.52%

-26.01%

+4.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-2.13%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.30%

-3.83%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.64%

-9.98%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.52%

-18.74%

-2.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.09%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.13%

-2.02%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

0.50%

+0.11%

Volatility

APDFX vs. BUFHX - Volatility Comparison

Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) has a higher volatility of 0.80% compared to Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX) at 0.60%. This indicates that APDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APDFXBUFHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

0.60%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.40%

1.97%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02%

2.51%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.95%

3.15%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.24%

4.04%

+1.20%

APDFX vs. BUFHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APDFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFHX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

APDFX vs. BUFHX - Dividend Comparison

APDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, which matches BUFHX's 7.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APDFX
Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class
7.06%6.86%7.27%7.39%6.34%5.41%5.42%6.94%7.17%8.01%6.70%7.48%
BUFHX
Buffalo High Yield Fund
7.08%6.84%8.03%6.41%8.05%7.24%4.11%4.21%5.17%4.57%3.85%5.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


APDFX and BUFHX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APDFX has higher volatility (0.80%) compared to BUFHX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APDFX dropped -21.52% vs BUFHX's -26.01%.

BUFHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APDFX and BUFHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer