PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOR vs. CTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOR vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOR achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 22.34% return.


AOR

1D
0.22%
1M
3.07%
YTD
7.96%
6M
8.80%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*
8.46%

CTAP

1D
0.68%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
22.34%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOR vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AOR and CTAP is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.18

AOR vs. CTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AOR
CTAP

Technology

27.8%

-

Financial Services

16.2%
49.3%

Industrials

11.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%

-

Communication Services

8.1%

-

Healthcare

8.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Energy

4.3%

-

Basic Materials

4.2%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Technology

AOR
27.8%
CTAP

-

Financial Services

AOR
16.2%
CTAP
49.3%

Industrials

AOR
11.9%
CTAP

-

Consumer Cyclical

AOR
9.5%
CTAP

-

Communication Services

AOR
8.1%
CTAP

-

Healthcare

AOR
8.0%
CTAP

-

Consumer Defensive

AOR
5.0%
CTAP

-

Energy

AOR
4.3%
CTAP

-

Basic Materials

AOR
4.2%
CTAP

-

Utilities

AOR
2.7%
CTAP

-

Real Estate

AOR
2.4%
CTAP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOR vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOR
AOR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

CTAP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOR vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AORCTAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.48

AOR vs. CTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AORCTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

2.56

-1.87

Drawdowns

AOR vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, which is greater than CTAP's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and CTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AORCTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.44%

-9.02%

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.16%

+4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-2.16%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

Volatility

AOR vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AORCTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.40%

24.03%

-15.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.55%

24.03%

-13.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.67%

24.03%

-13.36%

AOR vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AOR vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than CTAP's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOR
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF
2.46%2.55%2.66%2.50%2.12%1.64%1.89%2.56%2.49%4.51%2.16%2.12%
CTAP
Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF
0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOR and CTAP have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AOR.

AOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.64% for CTAP.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AOR and 0.10% for CTAP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOR and CTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer