PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOMIX vs. PALDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOMIX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Investments One Choice Portfolio: Moderate (AOMIX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOMIX achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's 7.89% return.


AOMIX

1D
0.18%
1M
2.88%
YTD
6.36%
6M
6.63%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
12.13%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
8.11%

PALDX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.48%
YTD
7.89%
6M
8.39%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOMIX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AOMIX
American Century Investments One Choice Portfolio: Moderate
6.36%12.97%10.07%13.04%-16.37%11.82%16.08%20.14%-5.23%3.04%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
7.89%13.62%18.96%18.90%-15.65%16.30%10.68%22.27%-4.12%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between AOMIX and PALDX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017

0.92

The correlation between AOMIX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOMIX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOMIX
AOMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AOMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
AOMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

PALDX
PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOMIX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Investments One Choice Portfolio: Moderate (AOMIX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AOMIXPALDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.52

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

3.62

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

17.16

-7.21

AOMIX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOMIX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOMIXPALDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.73

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.79

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.81

-0.22

Drawdowns

AOMIX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOMIX drawdown since its inception was -38.62%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOMIX and PALDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOMIXPALDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.62%

-26.16%

-12.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.91%

-5.96%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.84%

-16.06%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.24%

-20.47%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-4.09%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.25%

+0.37%

Volatility

AOMIX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Investments One Choice Portfolio: Moderate (AOMIX) has a higher volatility of 2.42% compared to PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) at 2.30%. This indicates that AOMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOMIXPALDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

2.30%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.50%

6.18%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.18%

7.89%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.51%

12.11%

-1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.28%

12.69%

-1.41%

AOMIX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOMIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AOMIX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

AOMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.22%, more than PALDX's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOMIX
American Century Investments One Choice Portfolio: Moderate
6.22%6.69%2.53%2.29%10.49%9.55%8.48%6.61%8.27%2.11%3.64%7.11%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
5.02%5.42%10.40%2.94%6.19%6.87%2.58%4.58%3.65%1.48%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, AOMIX and PALDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AOMIX has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to PALDX (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOMIX dropped -38.62% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOMIX and PALDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer