AOM vs. DGRO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AOM (iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AOM is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S&P Target Risk Moderate, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AOM returned 6.22%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for DGRO. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOM charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.

Performance

AOM vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOM achieves a 5.00% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, AOM has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 6.22%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.

AOM

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 2.13%
• YTD: 5.00%
• 6M: 5.31%
• 1Y: 14.51%
• 3Y*: 10.87%
• 5Y*: 4.80%
• 10Y*: 6.22%

DGRO

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 3.14%
• YTD: 8.76%
• 6M: 8.75%
• 1Y: 22.54%
• 3Y*: 16.99%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: 13.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOM vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF	5.00%	13.28%	7.95%	12.38%	-14.54%	6.93%	10.02%	15.58%	-3.88%	11.63%
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	8.76%	15.69%	16.62%	10.47%	-7.91%	26.64%	9.50%	29.87%	-2.38%	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AOM and DGRO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014	0.77

The correlation between AOM and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

AOM vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AOM	DGRO
Technology	27.9%	19.4%
Financial Services	16.1%	21.2%
Industrials	11.9%	10.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	5.7%
Communication Services	8.1%	0.1%
Healthcare	8.0%	16.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	11.5%
Energy	4.3%	5.6%
Basic Materials	4.2%	2.5%
Utilities	2.7%	6.9%
Real Estate	2.4%	-

Return for Risk

AOM vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOM

AOM Risk / Return Rank: 65
AOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
AOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
AOM Omega Ratio Rank: 67
AOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
AOM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

DGRO

DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 71
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOM vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AOM	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	2.39	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	3.49	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.43	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	3.50	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.45	13.52	-1.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AOM vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOM and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AOM	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	2.39	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.77	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.80	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.76	-0.07

Drawdowns

AOM vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOM drawdown since its inception was -19.96%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOM and DGRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOM	DGRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.96%	-35.10%	+15.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.11%	-6.47%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.85%	-14.03%	+7.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.96%	-19.31%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.96%	-35.10%	+15.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-0.28%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.70%	-3.44%	+0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	1.67%	-0.50%

Volatility

AOM vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) have volatilities of 2.17% and 2.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOM	DGRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.17%	2.21%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.22%	6.91%	-1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.55%	9.48%	-2.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.14%	13.82%	-5.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.93%	16.62%	-8.69%

AOM vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AOM vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

AOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF	2.98%	2.98%	3.10%	2.79%	2.27%	1.56%	2.02%	2.66%	2.53%	3.31%	2.14%	1.98%
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	1.96%	2.09%	2.26%	2.45%	2.34%	1.93%	2.30%	2.21%	2.44%	2.03%	2.27%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOM and DGRO in my portfolio?

AOM and DGRO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AOM or DGRO?

DGRO has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to AOM (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOM dropped -19.96% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

Which ETF is better, AOM or DGRO?

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.30% vs 6.22% for AOM. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AOM or DGRO?

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 6.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOM or DGRO?

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOM or DGRO?

AOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.

What is the main difference between AOM and DGRO?

AOM is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. AOM tracks S&P Target Risk Moderate, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AOM and 0.08% for DGRO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.