AOK vs. IRTR
AOK (iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF) and IRTR (Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AOK is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S&P Target Risk Conservative Index, while IRTR is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by iShares. AOK is passively managed, while IRTR is actively managed. Over the past year, AOK returned 12.11% vs 14.08% for IRTR. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AOK charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for IRTR.
Performance
AOK vs. IRTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOK achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly lower than IRTR's 5.14% return.
AOK
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 4.26%
- 6M
- 4.14%
- 1Y
- 12.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 5.14%
IRTR
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 14.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOK vs. IRTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AOK iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF | 4.26% | 11.26% | 6.58% | 9.89% |
IRTR Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF | 5.14% | 12.70% | 7.59% | 10.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOK and IRTR is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.94 |
The correlation between AOK and IRTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
AOK vs. IRTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AOK
IRTR
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AOK
IRTR
Financial Services
AOK
IRTR
Industrials
AOK
IRTR
Communication Services
AOK
IRTR
Consumer Cyclical
AOK
IRTR
Healthcare
AOK
IRTR
Consumer Defensive
AOK
IRTR
Energy
AOK
IRTR
Basic Materials
AOK
IRTR
Utilities
AOK
IRTR
Real Estate
AOK
IRTR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOK vs. IRTR — Risk / Return Rank
AOK
IRTR
AOK vs. IRTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) and Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF (IRTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOK | IRTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.45 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 2.94 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.50 | 12.92 | -1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOK | IRTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 2.36 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 2.01 | -1.30 |
Drawdowns
AOK vs. IRTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOK drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, which is greater than IRTR's maximum drawdown of -6.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOK and IRTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOK | IRTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -6.29% | -12.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.50% | -4.82% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.41% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -0.78% | -1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 1.09% | -0.03% |
Volatility
AOK vs. IRTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) is 1.97%, while Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF (IRTR) has a volatility of 2.15%. This indicates that AOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOK | IRTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | 2.15% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.47% | 4.85% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.76% | 6.00% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.10% | 7.04% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.71% | 7.04% | -0.33% |
AOK vs. IRTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IRTR's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AOK vs. IRTR - Dividend Comparison
AOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than IRTR's 2.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOK iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.28% | 3.28% | 3.23% | 2.93% | 2.25% | 1.55% | 2.10% | 2.71% | 2.68% | 2.91% | 2.14% | 2.02% |
IRTR Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF | 2.99% | 3.03% | 3.03% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, AOK and IRTR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IRTR has higher volatility (2.15%) compared to AOK (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOK dropped -18.94% vs IRTR's -6.29%.
On 1-year performance, IRTR leads with 14.08% vs 12.11% for AOK. On fees, IRTR is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, AOK has been the lower-risk option at 1.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IRTR has performed better with a 14.08% return vs 12.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IRTR is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AOK.
AOK has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 2.99% for IRTR.
AOK is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while IRTR is Target Retirement Date. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AOK and 0.08% for IRTR.
IRTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOK and IRTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer