PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AOK vs. AOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

AOK vs. AOA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA).

AOK and AOA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AOK is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Conservative Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. AOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. Both AOK and AOA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

AOK vs. AOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AOK vs. AOA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AOK
iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF		0.12%11.26%6.58%10.85%-14.16%4.87%9.33%13.90%-3.09%9.70%
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF		-0.59%19.59%13.55%18.27%-16.23%15.42%12.82%22.60%-7.86%20.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOK achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly higher than AOA's -0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, AOK has underperformed AOA with an annualized return of 4.88%, while AOA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.69% annualized return.

AOK

1D
0.30%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
0.12%
6M
1.18%
1Y
9.60%
3Y*
8.05%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
4.88%

AOA

1D
0.61%
1M
-4.11%
YTD
-0.59%
6M
1.92%
1Y
18.69%
3Y*
14.47%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
9.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF

iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF

Often compared with AOK:
AOK vs. AOMAOK vs. SGOVAOK vs. AGGAOK vs. VOOAOK vs. VTAOK vs. EAOMAOK vs. VTI
Often compared with AOA:
AOA vs. AORAOA vs. VOOAOA vs. VASGXAOA vs. SPYAOA vs. AOMAOA vs. VSMGXAOA vs. SCHD

AOK vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AOK and AOA have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

AOK
iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF

Return for Risk

AOK vs. AOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AOK
AOK Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOK Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
AOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOK Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
AOA
AOA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOK vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

AOKAOADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.42

1.35

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

1.97

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

1.98

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.55

8.82

-0.27

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AOK vs. AOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOK Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the AOA Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOK and AOA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

AOKAOADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.35

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.62

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.72

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.65

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between AOK and AOA is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

AOK vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison

AOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than AOA's 2.19% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOK
iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF		3.34%3.28%3.23%2.93%2.25%1.55%2.10%2.71%2.68%2.91%2.14%2.02%
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF		2.19%2.18%2.30%2.22%2.10%1.67%1.71%2.50%2.37%5.09%2.26%2.15%

Drawdowns

AOK vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOK drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum AOA drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOK and AOA.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

AOKAOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.94%

-28.38%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.50%

-9.62%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.94%

-23.62%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.94%

-28.38%

+9.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-5.18%

+2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.38%

-4.08%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

2.16%

-0.99%

Volatility

AOK vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) is 2.87%, while iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) has a volatility of 5.28%. This indicates that AOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

AOKAOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

5.28%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.25%

8.34%

-4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.80%

13.87%

-7.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.05%

12.92%

-5.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.68%

13.51%

-6.83%