AOK vs. AOM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM).
AOK and AOM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AOK is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Conservative Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. AOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Moderate. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. Both AOK and AOM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AOK or AOM.
Correlation
The correlation between AOK and AOM is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AOK vs. AOM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AOK:
1.32
AOM:
1.47
AOK:
1.85
AOM:
2.09
AOK:
1.23
AOM:
1.27
AOK:
1.14
AOM:
1.56
AOK:
6.91
AOM:
8.56
AOK:
1.09%
AOM:
1.09%
AOK:
5.72%
AOM:
6.30%
AOK:
-18.93%
AOM:
-19.96%
AOK:
-2.22%
AOM:
-2.22%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOK achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than AOM's 8.17% return. Over the past 10 years, AOK has underperformed AOM with an annualized return of 3.89%, while AOM has yielded a comparatively higher 4.69% annualized return.
AOK
6.72%
-0.21%
3.07%
7.13%
3.13%
3.89%
AOM
8.17%
0.02%
3.52%
8.63%
4.19%
4.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AOK vs. AOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AOK and AOM have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AOK vs. AOM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AOK vs. AOM - Dividend Comparison
AOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than AOM's 4.12% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOK iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.23% | 2.93% | 2.25% | 1.55% | 2.10% | 2.72% | 2.68% | 2.91% | 2.14% | 2.02% | 2.08% | 1.82% |
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | 3.09% | 2.79% | 2.27% | 1.56% | 2.02% | 2.66% | 2.53% | 3.31% | 2.14% | 1.98% | 2.08% | 1.87% |
Drawdowns
AOK vs. AOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOK drawdown since its inception was -18.93%, smaller than the maximum AOM drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOK and AOM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AOK vs. AOM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) have volatilities of 1.91% and 1.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.