AOBLX vs. GFIZX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AOBLX (Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A) and GFIZX (GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, AOBLX returned 10.35%/yr vs 4.35%/yr for GFIZX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AOBLX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for GFIZX.

Performance

AOBLX vs. GFIZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A (AOBLX) and GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOBLX achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly higher than GFIZX's 2.37% return. Over the past 10 years, AOBLX has outperformed GFIZX with an annualized return of 10.35%, while GFIZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.35% annualized return.

AOBLX

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 12.92%
• 6M: 12.22%
• 1Y: 29.60%
• 3Y*: 16.99%
• 5Y*: 9.02%
• 10Y*: 10.35%

GFIZX

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: 2.28%
• 1Y: 7.56%
• 3Y*: 7.78%
• 5Y*: 3.36%
• 10Y*: 4.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOBLX vs. GFIZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AOBLX Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A	12.92%	19.59%	9.46%	15.00%	-14.64%	15.10%	13.15%	21.75%	-4.63%	14.99%
GFIZX GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund	2.37%	9.46%	6.69%	8.80%	-10.17%	3.82%	6.93%	10.74%	-2.13%	7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between AOBLX and GFIZX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2002	0.89

The correlation between AOBLX and GFIZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AOBLX vs. GFIZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOBLX

AOBLX Risk / Return Rank: 94
AOBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AOBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AOBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AOBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
AOBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

GFIZX

GFIZX Risk / Return Rank: 47
GFIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
GFIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
GFIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
GFIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
GFIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOBLX vs. GFIZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A (AOBLX) and GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AOBLX	GFIZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.11	1.74	+1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.39	2.54	+1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.35	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.83	2.05	+2.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.31	9.03	+13.28

AOBLX vs. GFIZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOBLX Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is higher than the GFIZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOBLX and GFIZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AOBLX vs. GFIZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOBLX drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, which is greater than GFIZX's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOBLX and GFIZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOBLX	GFIZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.70%	-18.90%	-17.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.42%	-3.98%	-2.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.52%	-5.54%	-7.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.48%	-14.03%	-6.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.31%	-14.03%	-10.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.38%	-0.68%	-0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.81%	-2.27%	-1.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.39%	0.90%	+0.49%

Volatility

AOBLX vs. GFIZX - Volatility Comparison

Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A (AOBLX) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) at 1.92%. This indicates that AOBLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFIZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOBLX	GFIZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.69%	1.92%	+1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.85%	3.98%	+3.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.98%	4.69%	+5.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.16%	5.44%	+5.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.34%	5.38%	+5.96%

AOBLX vs. GFIZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOBLX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than GFIZX's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOBLX vs. GFIZX - Dividend Comparison

AOBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than GFIZX's 5.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOBLX Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A	3.20%	3.48%	2.28%	1.52%	2.97%	8.33%	4.31%	5.78%	9.70%	9.22%	2.51%	3.97%
GFIZX GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund	5.56%	5.69%	4.75%	3.73%	4.69%	3.63%	2.89%	4.47%	3.27%	1.59%	1.17%	7.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOBLX and GFIZX in my portfolio?

AOBLX and GFIZX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AOBLX or GFIZX?

AOBLX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to GFIZX (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOBLX dropped -36.70% vs GFIZX's -18.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AOBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.