PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANWPX vs. BUYZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANWPX vs. BUYZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX) and Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANWPX achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly higher than BUYZ's -14.51% return.


ANWPX

1D
-0.58%
1M
4.09%
YTD
6.76%
6M
7.66%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
8.60%
10Y*
13.41%

BUYZ

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
-14.51%
6M
-15.65%
1Y
-13.45%
3Y*
11.23%
5Y*
-6.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANWPX vs. BUYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ANWPX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A
6.76%21.33%16.76%24.63%-25.92%17.64%42.37%
BUYZ
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
-14.51%8.70%28.25%39.13%-49.81%-19.38%111.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ANWPX and BUYZ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020

0.81

The correlation between ANWPX and BUYZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANWPX vs. BUYZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANWPX
ANWPX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
ANWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
ANWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

BUYZ
BUYZ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BUYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BUYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANWPX vs. BUYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX) and Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANWPXBUYZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.91

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

-0.44

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.31

-0.89

+8.19

ANWPX vs. BUYZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANWPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the BUYZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANWPX and BUYZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANWPXBUYZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

-0.61

+2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

-0.25

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.19

+0.48

Drawdowns

ANWPX vs. BUYZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANWPX drawdown since its inception was -52.34%, smaller than the maximum BUYZ drawdown of -68.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANWPX and BUYZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANWPXBUYZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.34%

-68.04%

+15.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-30.85%

+19.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-30.85%

+12.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.45%

-63.32%

+28.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-44.82%

+44.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-38.76%

+30.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

15.20%

-12.48%

Volatility

ANWPX vs. BUYZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX) is 3.98%, while Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that ANWPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUYZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANWPXBUYZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

5.10%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

17.15%

-6.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

22.22%

-8.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

27.17%

-9.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.83%

29.91%

-12.08%

ANWPX vs. BUYZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANWPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than BUYZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANWPX vs. BUYZ - Dividend Comparison

ANWPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, while BUYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANWPX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A
6.16%6.57%5.13%5.36%4.16%7.01%4.13%3.67%7.59%5.50%3.86%6.14%
BUYZ
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
0.00%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ANWPX and BUYZ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUYZ has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to ANWPX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANWPX dropped -52.34% vs BUYZ's -68.04%.

ANWPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANWPX and BUYZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer