ANGL vs. EMB
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB).
ANGL and EMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ANGL is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. It was launched on Apr 10, 2012. EMB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. Both ANGL and EMB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ANGL or EMB.
Correlation
The correlation between ANGL and EMB is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ANGL vs. EMB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ANGL:
1.16
EMB:
0.82
ANGL:
1.65
EMB:
1.17
ANGL:
1.21
EMB:
1.14
ANGL:
1.11
EMB:
0.41
ANGL:
7.21
EMB:
3.93
ANGL:
0.78%
EMB:
1.51%
ANGL:
4.84%
EMB:
7.23%
ANGL:
-35.07%
EMB:
-34.70%
ANGL:
-1.61%
EMB:
-7.27%
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with ANGL at 5.86% and EMB at 5.86%. Over the past 10 years, ANGL has outperformed EMB with an annualized return of 6.33%, while EMB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.63% annualized return.
ANGL
5.86%
-0.23%
3.76%
5.35%
4.33%
6.33%
EMB
5.86%
-0.61%
3.29%
5.74%
-0.25%
2.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ANGL vs. EMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANGL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EMB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ANGL vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ANGL vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison
ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, more than EMB's 5.14% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.21% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.20% | 6.00% | 5.25% | 5.79% | 5.82% | 6.80% | 6.10% |
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.14% | 4.74% | 5.04% | 3.90% | 3.88% | 4.51% | 5.64% | 4.54% | 4.83% | 4.84% | 4.56% | 4.75% |
Drawdowns
ANGL vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -35.07%, roughly equal to the maximum EMB drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and EMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ANGL vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) is 1.80%, while iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a volatility of 2.28%. This indicates that ANGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.