ANF vs. USLM
ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) and USLM (United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.) are both stocks. ANF operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while USLM operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, ANF returned 17.64%/yr vs 26.08%/yr for USLM. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ANF vs. USLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANF achieves a -36.82% return, which is significantly lower than USLM's -11.65% return. Over the past 10 years, ANF has underperformed USLM with an annualized return of 17.64%, while USLM has yielded a comparatively higher 26.08% annualized return.
ANF
- 1D
- 5.55%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- -36.82%
- 6M
- -17.16%
- 1Y
- -4.18%
- 3Y*
- 32.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.89%
- 10Y*
- 17.64%
USLM
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- YTD
- -11.65%
- 6M
- -12.38%
- 1Y
- -0.24%
- 3Y*
- 40.83%
- 5Y*
- 30.59%
- 10Y*
- 26.08%
ANF vs. USLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | -36.82% | -15.79% | 69.43% | 285.07% | -34.22% | 71.07% | 19.48% | -9.74% | 19.24% | 54.15% |
USLM United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. | -11.65% | -9.59% | 188.91% | 64.34% | 9.84% | 13.69% | 27.15% | 35.03% | -7.26% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANF and USLM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 1996 | 0.16 |
The correlation between ANF and USLM shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ANF:
$10.45
USLM:
$6.07
ANF:
7.61
USLM:
17.42
ANF:
0.00
USLM:
0.45
ANF:
0.71
USLM:
6.17
ANF:
$5.28B
USLM:
$369.31M
ANF:
$2.56B
USLM:
$177.91M
ANF:
$727.85M
USLM:
$185.83M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANF vs. USLM — Risk / Return Rank
ANF
USLM
ANF vs. USLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANF | USLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.04 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | -0.01 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | -0.02 | -0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANF | USLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 | -0.01 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.86 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.72 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.25 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
ANF vs. USLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANF drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than USLM's maximum drawdown of -77.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANF and USLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANF | USLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.59% | -77.09% | -9.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.65% | -26.55% | -19.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.89% | -45.87% | -20.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.93% | -45.87% | -24.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.45% | -45.87% | -26.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.66% | -32.66% | -26.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.90% | -27.35% | -15.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.11% | 11.12% | +12.99% |
Volatility
ANF vs. USLM - Volatility Comparison
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a higher volatility of 16.48% compared to United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) at 8.63%. This indicates that ANF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANF | USLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.48% | 8.63% | +7.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.51% | 32.06% | +6.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.56% | 40.45% | +21.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.01% | 35.91% | +25.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.97% | 36.37% | +24.60% |
Dividends
ANF vs. USLM - Dividend Comparison
ANF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% |
USLM United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. | 0.23% | 0.20% | 0.15% | 0.35% | 0.57% | 0.50% | 0.56% | 6.52% | 0.76% | 0.70% | 0.66% | 0.91% |
Financials
ANF vs. USLM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ANF vs. USLM - Profitability Comparison
ANF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
USLM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.75M and revenue of 87.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.5%.
ANF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
USLM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.78M and revenue of 87.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.7%.
ANF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
USLM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported a net income of 30.58M and revenue of 87.83M, resulting in a net margin of 34.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANF and USLM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANF has higher volatility (16.48%) compared to USLM (8.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANF dropped -86.59% vs USLM's -77.09%.
USLM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANF and USLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer