AMZU vs. METU
AMZU (Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares) and METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. AMZU is passively managed, while METU is actively managed. Over the past year, AMZU returned 8.26% vs -44.10% for METU. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMZU charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for METU.
Performance
AMZU vs. METU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZU achieves a 3.58% return, which is significantly higher than METU's -29.87% return.
AMZU
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -20.22%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 8.26%
- 3Y*
- 23.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METU
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -9.48%
- YTD
- -29.87%
- 6M
- -31.83%
- 1Y
- -44.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZU vs. METU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares | 3.58% | -11.59% | 30.12% |
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | -29.87% | -1.01% | 25.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZU and METU is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.60 |
The correlation between AMZU and METU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
AMZU vs. METU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZU
METU
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMZU
METU
-
Basic Materials
AMZU
-
METU
-
Communication Services
AMZU
-
METU
Consumer Defensive
AMZU
-
METU
-
Energy
AMZU
-
METU
-
Financial Services
AMZU
-
METU
-
Healthcare
AMZU
-
METU
-
Industrials
AMZU
-
METU
-
Real Estate
AMZU
-
METU
-
Technology
AMZU
-
METU
-
Utilities
AMZU
-
METU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZU vs. METU — Risk / Return Rank
AMZU
METU
AMZU vs. METU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZU | METU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.92 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | -0.72 | +0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.43 | -1.31 | +1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZU | METU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | -0.62 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | -0.09 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
AMZU vs. METU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZU drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum METU drawdown of -61.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZU and METU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZU | METU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.59% | -61.85% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.98% | -61.52% | +18.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.71% | -55.17% | +31.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.91% | -23.72% | +1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.04% | 33.71% | -14.67% |
Volatility
AMZU vs. METU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) is 15.59%, while Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a volatility of 21.06%. This indicates that AMZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZU | METU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.59% | 21.06% | -5.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.11% | 54.10% | -12.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.06% | 71.03% | -10.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.18% | 72.60% | -13.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.18% | 72.60% | -13.42% |
AMZU vs. METU - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than METU's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZU vs. METU - Dividend Comparison
AMZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than METU's 4.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares | 5.86% | 6.12% | 3.79% | 3.37% | 0.50% |
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | 4.40% | 3.00% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZU and METU have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METU has higher volatility (21.06%) compared to AMZU (15.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZU dropped -55.59% vs METU's -61.85%.
On 1-year performance, AMZU leads with 8.26% vs -44.10% for METU. On fees, AMZU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, AMZU has been the lower-risk option at 15.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMZU has performed better with a 8.26% return vs -44.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMZU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for METU.
AMZU has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 4.40% for METU.
Their fees differ too: 1.06% for AMZU and 1.07% for METU.
AMZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZU and METU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer