AMZU vs. HOOG

Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG).

AMZU and HOOG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMZU is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Amazon.com, Inc. (150%). It was launched on Sep 6, 2022. HOOG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Mar 20, 2025.

Performance

AMZU vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMZU vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares	-21.70%	15.09%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-68.81%	291.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZU achieves a -21.70% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -68.81% return.

AMZU

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -7.98%
• YTD: -21.70%
• 6M: -17.82%
• 1Y: 11.03%
• 3Y*: 23.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HOOG

• 1D: -3.42%
• 1M: -32.25%
• YTD: -68.81%
• 6M: -84.75%
• 1Y: 69.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZU vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.

AMZU

Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares

HOOG

Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF

Return for Risk

AMZU vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZU

AMZU Risk / Return Rank: 10
AMZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
AMZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
AMZU Omega Ratio Rank: 13
AMZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
AMZU Martin Ratio Rank: 8

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 28
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 39
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZU vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMZU	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	0.24	-0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.31	1.43	-1.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.17	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.13	0.44	-0.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.28	0.92	-1.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMZU vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZU Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZU and HOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMZU	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13	0.24	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.15	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between AMZU and HOOG is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AMZU vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

AMZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, less than HOOG's 39.45% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares	7.75%	6.12%	3.79%	3.37%	0.50%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	39.45%	12.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AMZU vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZU drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZU and HOOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZU	HOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.59%	-86.94%	+31.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.98%	-86.94%	+43.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.33%	-85.45%	+43.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.28%	-30.39%	+8.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.09%	41.72%	-22.63%

Volatility

AMZU vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) is 17.73%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 31.45%. This indicates that AMZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZU	HOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.73%	31.45%	-13.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.12%	100.69%	-55.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.51%	143.16%	-73.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.23%	143.39%	-84.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.23%	143.39%	-84.16%