AMZN vs. BOOT
AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) and BOOT (Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — AMZN in Internet Retail, BOOT in Apparel Retail. Over the past 10 years, AMZN returned 20.83%/yr vs 36.37%/yr for BOOT. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMZN vs. BOOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than BOOT's -3.32% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZN has underperformed BOOT with an annualized return of 20.83%, while BOOT has yielded a comparatively higher 36.37% annualized return.
AMZN
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -10.73%
- YTD
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- 1Y
- 12.47%
- 3Y*
- 23.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 20.83%
BOOT
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- 16.57%
- YTD
- -3.32%
- 6M
- -16.66%
- 1Y
- 8.48%
- 3Y*
- 29.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.59%
- 10Y*
- 36.37%
AMZN vs. BOOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 3.35% | 5.21% | 44.39% | 80.88% | -49.62% | 2.38% | 76.26% | 23.03% | 28.43% | 55.96% |
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. | -3.32% | 16.24% | 97.79% | 22.78% | -49.19% | 183.79% | -2.63% | 161.48% | 2.53% | 32.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZN and BOOT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2014 | 0.27 |
The correlation between AMZN and BOOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AMZN:
$2.59T
BOOT:
$5.24B
AMZN:
$8.37
BOOT:
$7.35
AMZN:
28.50
BOOT:
23.21
AMZN:
0.69
BOOT:
4.75
AMZN:
3.48
BOOT:
2.33
AMZN:
5.87
BOOT:
3.97
AMZN:
$742.78B
BOOT:
$2.25B
AMZN:
$348.59B
BOOT:
$858.36M
AMZN:
$152.71B
BOOT:
$358.43M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZN vs. BOOT — Risk / Return Rank
AMZN
BOOT
AMZN vs. BOOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZN | BOOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.05 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 0.13 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | 0.33 | +0.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZN vs. BOOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than BOOT's maximum drawdown of -83.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and BOOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZN | BOOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.40% | -83.73% | -10.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.74% | -35.01% | +13.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | -48.93% | +18.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.15% | -60.62% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.15% | -77.88% | +21.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.25% | -17.97% | +4.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.19% | -32.31% | +4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.21% | 13.87% | -4.66% |
Volatility
AMZN vs. BOOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) is 7.92%, while Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) has a volatility of 14.54%. This indicates that AMZN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZN | BOOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.92% | 14.54% | -6.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.73% | 33.46% | -12.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.13% | 43.52% | -13.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 49.90% | -14.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.48% | 57.02% | -24.54% |
Dividends
AMZN vs. BOOT - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMZN nor BOOT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AMZN vs. BOOT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amazon.com, Inc and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMZN vs. BOOT - Profitability Comparison
AMZN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
BOOT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 195.75M and revenue of 538.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
AMZN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
BOOT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.22M and revenue of 538.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
AMZN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.
BOOT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 44.44M and revenue of 538.75M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZN and BOOT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOOT has higher volatility (14.54%) compared to AMZN (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZN dropped -94.40% vs BOOT's -83.73%.
AMZN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZN and BOOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer