AMZN vs. ASEA
AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) is a stock, while ASEA (Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. Over the past 10 years, AMZN returned 20.23%/yr vs 7.65%/yr for ASEA. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AMZN vs. ASEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than ASEA's 16.39% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZN has outperformed ASEA with an annualized return of 20.23%, while ASEA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.65% annualized return.
AMZN
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- 6M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 0.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 20.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 29.53%
ASEA
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 7.14%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- YTD
- 16.39%
- 1Y
- 28.24%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- 7.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | $9.21B | $12.90B | $12.21B |
| $593.31K | $523.08K | $605.79K |
AMZN vs. ASEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.56% | 5.21% | 44.39% | 80.88% | -49.62% | 2.38% | 76.26% | 23.03% | 28.43% | 55.96% |
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF | 16.39% | 19.80% | 9.82% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 4.66% | -7.88% | 8.34% | -7.58% | 35.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZN and ASEA is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2011 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZN vs. ASEA — Risk / Return Rank
AMZN
ASEA
AMZN vs. ASEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZN | ASEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.33 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 3.33 | -3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 8.85 | -8.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZN vs. ASEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than ASEA's maximum drawdown of -44.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and ASEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZN | ASEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.40% | -44.16% | -50.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.74% | -8.28% | -13.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | -22.20% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.73% | -22.20% | -33.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.15% | -44.16% | -11.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.59% | -1.04% | -14.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.13% | -10.58% | -17.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.06% | 3.13% | +6.93% |
Volatility
AMZN vs. ASEA - Volatility Comparison
Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) at 3.50%. This indicates that AMZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZN | ASEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.77% | 3.50% | +5.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | 11.74% | +10.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.47% | 14.59% | +16.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.75% | 14.72% | +21.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.63% | 17.49% | +15.14% |
Dividends
AMZN vs. ASEA - Dividend Comparison
AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF | 3.71% | 3.95% | 3.61% | 3.76% | 2.23% | 4.19% | 2.27% | 2.51% | 3.08% | 1.59% | 2.78% | 3.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZN and ASEA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZN has higher volatility (8.77%) compared to ASEA (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZN dropped -94.40% vs ASEA's -44.16%.
ASEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZN and ASEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer