AMZA vs. VPC
AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) and VPC (Virtus Private Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus, while VPC is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Indxx Private Credit Index. AMZA is actively managed, while VPC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMZA returned 22.88%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for VPC. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AMZA charges 2.01%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for VPC.
Performance
AMZA vs. VPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 30.46% return, which is significantly higher than VPC's -11.53% return.
AMZA
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 5.94%
- 6M
- 21.61%
- YTD
- 30.46%
- 1Y
- 23.26%
- 3Y*
- 22.79%
- 5Y*
- 22.88%
- 10Y*
- 5.46%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.35%
VPC
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- 6M
- -11.08%
- YTD
- -11.53%
- 1Y
- -16.30%
- 3Y*
- -1.29%
- 5Y*
- 0.87%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | $1.66M | $1.65M | $1.75M |
| $87.07K | $126.50K | $156.13K |
AMZA vs. VPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 30.46% | 0.17% | 30.90% | 23.35% | 33.20% | 51.22% | -49.25% | -8.48% |
VPC Virtus Private Credit ETF | -11.53% | -6.75% | 10.52% | 22.20% | -11.70% | 34.18% | -9.50% | 9.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZA and VPC is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AMZA and VPC has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZA vs. VPC — Risk / Return Rank
AMZA
VPC
AMZA vs. VPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZA | VPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.81 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | -0.79 | +2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | -1.37 | +5.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZA vs. VPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than VPC's maximum drawdown of -53.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and VPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZA | VPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.46% | -53.45% | -38.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -21.55% | +9.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.56% | -24.86% | +6.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -24.86% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.13% | -21.64% | +17.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.51% | -7.95% | -36.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 12.51% | -7.49% |
Volatility
AMZA vs. VPC - Volatility Comparison
InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) at 3.44%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZA | VPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 3.44% | +1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.17% | 11.09% | +3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.20% | 13.74% | +4.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.27% | 13.58% | +11.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.14% | 20.42% | +16.72% |
AMZA vs. VPC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than VPC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZA vs. VPC - Dividend Comparison
AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, less than VPC's 16.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 7.83% | 8.81% | 7.29% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
VPC Virtus Private Credit ETF | 16.46% | 14.33% | 11.26% | 11.71% | 10.74% | 6.31% | 10.06% | 8.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZA and VPC have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZA has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to VPC (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZA dropped -91.46% vs VPC's -53.45%.
On 5-year performance, AMZA leads with 22.88% vs 0.87% for VPC. On fees, VPC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, VPC has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AMZA has performed better with a 22.88% return vs 0.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VPC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.
VPC has the higher dividend yield at 16.46%, compared with 7.83% for AMZA.
AMZA is categorized as MLPs, while VPC is Nontraditional Bonds. Their fees differ too: 2.01% for AMZA and 0.75% for VPC.
AMZA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZA and VPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer