AMZA vs. VEMY
AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) and VEMY (Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus, while VEMY is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Virtus. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMZA returned 22.79%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for VEMY. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AMZA charges 2.01%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for VEMY.
Performance
AMZA vs. VEMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 30.46% return, which is significantly higher than VEMY's 5.65% return.
AMZA
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 5.94%
- 6M
- 21.61%
- YTD
- 30.46%
- 1Y
- 23.26%
- 3Y*
- 22.79%
- 5Y*
- 22.88%
- 10Y*
- 5.46%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.35%
VEMY
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- 6M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | $1.66M | $1.65M | $1.75M |
| $966.52K | $884.39K | $876.68K |
AMZA vs. VEMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 30.46% | 0.17% | 30.90% | 23.35% | 2.70% |
VEMY Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 5.65% | 15.27% | 13.48% | 14.45% | -1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZA and VEMY is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022 | 0.16 |
The correlation between AMZA and VEMY shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZA vs. VEMY — Risk / Return Rank
AMZA
VEMY
AMZA vs. VEMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZA | VEMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.43 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 3.23 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 14.88 | -10.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZA vs. VEMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than VEMY's maximum drawdown of -8.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and VEMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZA | VEMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.46% | -8.77% | -82.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -4.00% | -7.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.56% | -6.57% | -11.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.13% | -1.07% | -3.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.51% | -1.27% | -43.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 0.87% | +4.15% |
Volatility
AMZA vs. VEMY - Volatility Comparison
InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) at 1.13%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZA | VEMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 1.13% | +4.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.17% | 4.52% | +9.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.20% | 6.02% | +12.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.27% | 7.52% | +17.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.14% | 7.52% | +29.62% |
AMZA vs. VEMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than VEMY's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZA vs. VEMY - Dividend Comparison
AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, less than VEMY's 8.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 7.83% | 8.81% | 7.29% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
VEMY Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 8.12% | 8.89% | 10.28% | 9.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZA and VEMY have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZA has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to VEMY (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZA dropped -91.46% vs VEMY's -8.77%.
On 3-year performance, AMZA leads with 22.79% vs 13.84% for VEMY. On fees, VEMY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, VEMY has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AMZA has performed better with a 22.79% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEMY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.
VEMY has the higher dividend yield at 8.12%, compared with 7.83% for AMZA.
AMZA is categorized as MLPs, while VEMY is Emerging Markets Bonds. Their fees differ too: 2.01% for AMZA and 0.58% for VEMY.
VEMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZA and VEMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer