PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEMY vs. NUKZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEMY vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEMY achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 9.01% return.


VEMY

1D
0.00%
1M
1.75%
YTD
6.35%
6M
6.44%
1Y
17.80%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
10Y*

NUKZ

1D
-2.63%
1M
-2.18%
YTD
9.01%
6M
6.01%
1Y
28.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEMY vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VEMY
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
6.35%15.27%13.74%
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
9.01%56.57%60.11%

Correlation

The correlation between VEMY and NUKZ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEMY vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEMY
VEMY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VEMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

NUKZ
NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEMY vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEMYNUKZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.17

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

1.72

+2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.16

4.11

+17.04

VEMY vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMY Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMY and NUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEMY vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMY drawdown since its inception was -8.77%, smaller than the maximum NUKZ drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMY and NUKZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEMYNUKZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-33.03%

+24.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.00%

-16.51%

+12.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-9.20%

+8.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-6.08%

+4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

6.91%

-6.07%

Volatility

VEMY vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) is 1.42%, while Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a volatility of 10.93%. This indicates that VEMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEMYNUKZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

10.93%

-9.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.75%

23.18%

-18.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.09%

30.61%

-24.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.61%

32.89%

-25.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.61%

32.89%

-25.28%

VEMY vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEMY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEMY vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

VEMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, more than NUKZ's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
0.84%0.91%0.09%0.00%
VEMY
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
8.21%8.89%10.28%9.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEMY and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUKZ has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to VEMY (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEMY dropped -8.77% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.

On 1-year performance, NUKZ leads with 28.33% vs 17.80% for VEMY. On fees, VEMY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, VEMY has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NUKZ has performed better with a 28.33% return vs 17.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEMY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

VEMY has the higher dividend yield at 8.21%, compared with 0.84% for NUKZ.

VEMY is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while NUKZ is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for VEMY and 0.85% for NUKZ.

VEMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEMY and NUKZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer