AMZA vs. PFFR
AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) and PFFR (InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while PFFR is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index. AMZA is actively managed, while PFFR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMZA returned 19.41%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for PFFR. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZA charges 2.01%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PFFR.
Performance
AMZA vs. PFFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 22.22% return, which is significantly higher than PFFR's 0.80% return.
AMZA
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 22.22%
- 6M
- 20.41%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 19.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
PFFR
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 6.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- —
AMZA vs. PFFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 22.22% | 0.17% | 30.90% | 23.35% | 33.20% | 51.22% | -49.25% | 6.27% | -26.78% | -10.60% |
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 0.80% | 5.36% | 7.12% | 21.04% | -23.90% | 6.76% | 0.19% | 20.28% | -7.45% | 7.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZA and PFFR is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AMZA and PFFR has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
AMZA vs. PFFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZA
PFFR
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
AMZA
PFFR
-
Utilities
AMZA
PFFR
-
Basic Materials
AMZA
-
PFFR
-
Communication Services
AMZA
-
PFFR
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMZA
-
PFFR
-
Consumer Defensive
AMZA
-
PFFR
-
Financial Services
AMZA
-
PFFR
Healthcare
AMZA
-
PFFR
-
Industrials
AMZA
-
PFFR
-
Real Estate
AMZA
-
PFFR
Technology
AMZA
-
PFFR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZA vs. PFFR — Risk / Return Rank
AMZA
PFFR
AMZA vs. PFFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZA | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.87 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.27 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.16 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 1.04 | +0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.65 | 2.44 | +1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZA | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.87 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.09 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.16 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
AMZA vs. PFFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than PFFR's maximum drawdown of -53.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and PFFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZA | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.46% | -53.02% | -38.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -6.57% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.56% | -11.16% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -29.80% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.19% | -3.05% | -7.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.02% | -7.00% | -38.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.82% | 2.80% | +2.02% |
Volatility
AMZA vs. PFFR - Volatility Comparison
InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) at 2.81%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZA | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 2.81% | +2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.40% | 6.14% | +7.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 7.91% | +9.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.84% | 10.47% | +15.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.25% | 20.54% | +16.71% |
AMZA vs. PFFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFR's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZA vs. PFFR - Dividend Comparison
AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, less than PFFR's 8.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 8.02% | 8.81% | 7.29% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 8.29% | 7.99% | 7.78% | 7.72% | 8.60% | 6.08% | 6.11% | 5.77% | 6.48% | 6.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZA and PFFR have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZA has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to PFFR (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZA dropped -91.46% vs PFFR's -53.02%.
On 5-year performance, AMZA leads with 19.41% vs 0.97% for PFFR. On fees, PFFR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PFFR has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AMZA has performed better with a 19.41% return vs 0.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFFR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.
PFFR has the higher dividend yield at 8.29%, compared with 8.02% for AMZA.
AMZA is categorized as MLPs, while PFFR is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. Their fees differ too: 2.01% for AMZA and 0.45% for PFFR.
AMZA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZA and PFFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer