PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZA vs. BBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZA vs. BBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF (BBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 18.51% return, which is significantly lower than BBC's 27.49% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZA has underperformed BBC with an annualized return of 4.65%, while BBC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.30% annualized return.


AMZA

1D
-3.41%
1M
-6.40%
YTD
18.51%
6M
18.21%
1Y
14.09%
3Y*
21.29%
5Y*
18.59%
10Y*
4.65%

BBC

1D
1.38%
1M
15.11%
YTD
27.49%
6M
21.92%
1Y
152.00%
3Y*
27.59%
5Y*
-0.18%
10Y*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZA vs. BBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
18.51%0.17%30.90%23.35%33.20%51.22%-49.25%6.27%-26.78%-6.90%
BBC
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF
27.49%63.77%-1.11%-1.80%-35.13%-22.31%30.32%63.81%-18.29%57.85%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZA and BBC is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2014

0.27

The correlation between AMZA and BBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AMZA vs. BBC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMZA
BBC

Energy

99.8%

-

Utilities

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

100.0%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

AMZA
99.8%
BBC

-

Utilities

AMZA
0.2%
BBC

-

Basic Materials

AMZA

-

BBC

-

Communication Services

AMZA

-

BBC

-

Consumer Cyclical

AMZA

-

BBC

-

Consumer Defensive

AMZA

-

BBC

-

Financial Services

AMZA

-

BBC

-

Healthcare

AMZA

-

BBC
100.0%

Industrials

AMZA

-

BBC

-

Real Estate

AMZA

-

BBC

-

Technology

AMZA

-

BBC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZA vs. BBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZA
AMZA Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
AMZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZA Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZA Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BBC
BBC Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBC Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBC Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZA vs. BBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF (BBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZABBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.55

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

10.13

-8.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.84

29.69

-26.85

AMZA vs. BBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZA Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the BBC Sharpe Ratio of 4.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZA and BBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZA vs. BBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than BBC's maximum drawdown of -76.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and BBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZABBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.46%

-76.85%

-14.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.16%

-15.10%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.56%

-54.45%

+35.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.15%

-71.97%

+46.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.84%

-76.85%

-9.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.92%

-18.17%

+5.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.84%

-37.07%

-7.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

5.14%

-0.17%

Volatility

AMZA vs. BBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) is 6.68%, while Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF (BBC) has a volatility of 11.92%. This indicates that AMZA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZABBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

11.92%

-5.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.02%

26.73%

-12.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.15%

36.27%

-18.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.71%

39.51%

-13.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.21%

37.75%

-0.54%

AMZA vs. BBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than BBC's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMZA vs. BBC - Dividend Comparison

AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, more than BBC's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
8.45%8.81%7.29%9.40%7.65%10.24%22.13%19.47%34.46%24.16%18.36%18.21%
BBC
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF
1.33%1.70%1.00%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.09%0.00%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZA and BBC have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBC has higher volatility (11.92%) compared to AMZA (6.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZA dropped -91.46% vs BBC's -76.85%.

On 10-year performance, BBC leads with 11.30% vs 4.65% for AMZA. On fees, BBC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, AMZA has been the lower-risk option at 6.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BBC has performed better with a 11.30% return vs 4.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.

AMZA has the higher dividend yield at 8.45%, compared with 1.33% for BBC.

AMZA is categorized as MLPs, while BBC is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 2.01% for AMZA and 0.79% for BBC.

BBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZA and BBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer